Exploring the canonical behaviour of long gamma-ray bursts using an intrinsic multiwavelength afterglow correlation. Issue 4 (15th September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Oates, S. R.; Racusin, J. L.; De Pasquale, M.; Page, M. J.; Castro-Tirado, A. J.; Gorosabel, J.; Smith, P. J.; Breeveld, A. A.; Kuin, N. P. M
• Is Part Of: Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Volume 453:Issue 4(2015)
• Page Start: 4121
• Page End: 4135
• Publication Date: 2015-09-15
• Subjects: gamma-ray burst: general; Astronomy -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 520.5
• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1956
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0035-8711

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, we further investigate the relationship, reported by Oates et al., between the optical/UV afterglow luminosity (measured at restframe 200 s) and average afterglow decay rate (measured from restframe 200 s onwards) of long duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). We extend the analysis by examining the X-ray light curves, finding a consistent correlation. We therefore explore how the parameters of these correlations relate to the prompt emission phase and, using a Monte Carlo simulation, explore whether these correlations are consistent with predictions of the standard afterglow model. We find significant correlations between: log L O, 200 s and log L X, 200 s ; α O, >200 s and α X, >200 s, consistent with simulations. The model also predicts relationships between log E iso and log L 200 s ; however, while we find such relationships in the observed sample, the slope of the linear regression is shallower than that simulated and inconsistent at ≳3σ. Simulations also do not agree with correlations observed between log L 200 s and α> 200 s, or $\rm log\;\it E_{iso}$ and α> 200 s . Overall, these observed correlations are consistent with a common underlying physical mechanism producing GRBs and their afterglows regardless of their detailed temporal behaviour. However, a basic afterglow model has difficulty explaining all the observed correlations. This leads us to briefly discuss alternative more complex models.