Efficacy and safety of co‐administered telmisartan/amlodipine and rosuvastatin in subjects with hypertension and dyslipidemia. Issue 10 (16th September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy and safety of co‐administered telmisartan/amlodipine and rosuvastatin in subjects with hypertension and dyslipidemia. Issue 10 (16th September 2020)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy and safety of co‐administered telmisartan/amlodipine and rosuvastatin in subjects with hypertension and dyslipidemia
- Authors:
- Jin, Xuan
Kim, Moo Hyun
Han, Ki Hoon
Hong, Soon Jun
Ahn, Jeong‐Cheon
Sung, Jung‐Hoon
Cho, Jin‐Man
Lee, Han Cheol
Choi, So‐Yeon
Lee, Kyounghoon
Kim, Woo‐Shik
Rhee, Moo‐Yong
Kim, Ju Han
Hong, Seung Pyo
Yoo, Byung Su
Cho, Eun Joo
Lee, Jae‐Hwan
Kim, Pum‐Joon
Park, Chang‐Gyu
Hyon, Min Su
Shin, Jin Ho
Lee, Sang Hyun
Sung, Ki Chul
Hwang, Jinyong
Kwon, Kihwan
Chae, In‐Ho
Seo, Jeong‐Sook
Kim, Hyungseop
Lee, Hana
Cho, Yoonhwa
Kim, Hyo‐Soo
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Single risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, can combine to exacerbate the development and severity of cardiovascular disease. Treatment goals may be more effectively achieved if multiple disease factors are targeted with combination treatment. We enrolled 202 patients who were randomly divided into the following three groups: telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg, telmisartan 80 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg, and telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg. The primary efficacy variables were changes from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) between telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg and telmisartan 80 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg at 8 weeks, and the percent changes from baseline in low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol between telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg and telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg at 8 weeks. The secondary efficacy variables were changes in MSSBP, mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP), LDL cholesterol and other lipid levels at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, as well as observed adverse events during follow‐up. There were no significant differences between the three groups in demographic characteristics and no significant difference among the three groups in terms of baseline characteristics for the validity evaluation variables. The mean overall treatment compliance in the three groups was, respectively, 98.42%, 96.68%, and 98.12%, indicating strong compliance for all patients. TheAbstract: Single risk factors, such as hypertension and dyslipidemia, can combine to exacerbate the development and severity of cardiovascular disease. Treatment goals may be more effectively achieved if multiple disease factors are targeted with combination treatment. We enrolled 202 patients who were randomly divided into the following three groups: telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg, telmisartan 80 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg, and telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg. The primary efficacy variables were changes from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) between telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg and telmisartan 80 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg at 8 weeks, and the percent changes from baseline in low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol between telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg and telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg at 8 weeks. The secondary efficacy variables were changes in MSSBP, mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP), LDL cholesterol and other lipid levels at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, as well as observed adverse events during follow‐up. There were no significant differences between the three groups in demographic characteristics and no significant difference among the three groups in terms of baseline characteristics for the validity evaluation variables. The mean overall treatment compliance in the three groups was, respectively, 98.42%, 96.68%, and 98.12%, indicating strong compliance for all patients. The Least‐Square (LS) mean (SE) for changes in MSSBP in the two (telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg and telmisartan 80 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg) groups were −19.3 (2.68) mm Hg and −6.69 (2.76) mm Hg. The difference between the two groups was significant (−12.60 (2.77) mm Hg, 95% CI −18.06 to −7.14, P < .0001). The LS Mean for the percent changes from baseline in LDL cholesterol in the two (telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg + rosuvastatin 20 mg and telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg) groups were −52.45 (3.23) % and 2.68 (3.15) %. The difference between the two groups was significant (−55.13 (3.20) %, 95% CI −61.45 to −48.81, P < .0001). There were no adverse events leading to discontinuation or death. Combined administration of telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg and rosuvastatin 20 mg for the treatment of hypertensive patients with dyslipidemia significantly reduces blood pressure and improves lipid control. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03067688. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical hypertension. Volume 22:Issue 10(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical hypertension
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Issue 10(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 10 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0022-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 1835
- Page End:
- 1845
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09-16
- Subjects:
- amlodipine -- dyslipidemia -- hypertension -- rosuvastatin -- telmisartan
Hypertension -- Periodicals
616.132 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1751-7176 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/jch ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jch.13893 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1524-6175
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4958.484100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20816.xml