Injury measurements improve interpretation of thrombus formation data in the cremaster arteriole laser‐induced injury model of thrombosis. (29th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Grover, Steven P.; Bendapudi, Pavan K.; Yang, Moua; Merrill‐Skoloff, Glenn; Govindarajan, Vijay; Mitrophanov, Alexander Y.; Flaumenhaft, Robert
• Is Part Of: Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis. Volume 18:Number 11(2020)
• Page Start: 3078
• Page End: 3085
• Publication Date: 2020-10-29
• Subjects: animal models -- blood platelets -- fibrin -- thrombosis; Thrombosis -- Periodicals; Hemostasis -- Periodicals; Blood coagulation disorders -- Periodicals; 616.1
• DOI: 10.1111/jth.15059
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1538-7933

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The cremaster arteriole laser‐induced injury model is a powerful technique with which to investigate the molecular mechanisms that drive thrombus formation. This model is capable of direct visualization and quantification of accumulation of thrombus constituents, including both platelets and fibrin. However, a large degree of variability in platelet accumulation and fibrin formation is observed between thrombi. Strategies to understand this variability will enhance performance and standardization of the model. We determined whether ablation injury size contributes to variation in platelet accumulation and fibrin formation and, if so, whether incorporating ablation injury size into measurements reduces variation. Methods: Thrombus formation was initiated by laser‐induced injury of cremaster arterioles of mice (n = 59 injuries). Ablation injuries within the vessel wall were consistently identified and quantified by measuring the length of vessel wall injury observed immediately following laser‐induced disruption. Platelet accumulation and fibrin formation as detected by fluorescently labeled antibodies were captured by digital intravital microscopy. Results: Laser‐induced disruption of the vessel wall resulted in ablation injuries of variable length (18‐95 µm) enabling interrogation of the relationship between injury severity and thrombus dynamics. Strong positive correlations were observed between vessel injury length and both platelet accumulation and fibrin formation when the data are transformed as area under the curve (Spearman r = .80 and .76, respectively). Normalization of area under the curve measurements by injury length reduced intraclass coefficients of variation among thrombi and improved hypothesis testing when comparing different data sets. Conclusions: Measurement of vessel wall injury length provides a reliable and robust marker of injury severity. Injury length can effectively normalize measurements of platelet accumulation and fibrin formation improving data interpretation and standardization.