Tree planting in organic soils does not result in net carbon sequestration on decadal timescales. (14th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Friggens, Nina L.; Hester, Alison J.; Mitchell, Ruth J.; Parker, Thomas C.; Subke, Jens‐Arne; Wookey, Philip A.
• Is Part Of: Global change biology. Volume 26:Number 9(2020)
• Page Start: 5178
• Page End: 5188
• Publication Date: 2020-07-14
• Subjects: afforestation -- Betula pubescens -- carbon stocks -- climate change mitigation -- mycorrhiza -- Pinus sylvestris -- soil carbon dynamics -- tree planting; Climatic changes -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Troposphere -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals; Eutrophication -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15229
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1354-1013

Abstract

Abstract: Tree planting is increasingly being proposed as a strategy to combat climate change through carbon (C) sequestration in tree biomass. However, total ecosystem C storage that includes soil organic C (SOC) must be considered to determine whether planting trees for climate change mitigation results in increased C storage. We show that planting two native tree species ( Betula pubescens and Pinus sylvestris ), of widespread Eurasian distribution, onto heather ( Calluna vulgaris ) moorland with podzolic and peaty podzolic soils in Scotland, did not lead to an increase in net ecosystem C stock 12 or 39 years after planting. Plots with trees had greater soil respiration and lower SOC in organic soil horizons than heather control plots. The decline in SOC cancelled out the increment in C stocks in tree biomass on decadal timescales. At all four experimental sites sampled, there was no net gain in ecosystem C stocks 12–39 years after afforestation—indeed we found a net ecosystem C loss in one of four sites with deciduous B. pubescens stands; no net gain in ecosystem C at three sites planted with B. pubescens ; and no net gain at additional stands of P. sylvestris . We hypothesize that altered mycorrhizal communities and autotrophic C inputs have led to positive 'priming' of soil organic matter, resulting in SOC loss, constraining the benefits of tree planting for ecosystem C sequestration. The results are of direct relevance to current policies, which promote tree planting on the assumption that this will increase net ecosystem C storage and contribute to climate change mitigation. Ecosystem‐level biogeochemistry and C fluxes must be better quantified and understood before we can be assured that large‐scale tree planting in regions with considerable pre‐existing SOC stocks will have the intended policy and climate change mitigation outcomes. Abstract : Planting birch trees onto heather moorland resulted in a significant reduction of soil organic carbon stocks 12 years after planting, which was not compensated for by gains in carbon stored in the growing trees. 39 years after planting birch trees, the carbon sequestered into tree biomass offset the carbon lost from the soil but, crucially, did not result in an increase in ecosystem carbon stocks. When considering both above‐ and below‐ground carbon stocks together, planting trees onto heather moorlands did not lead to an increase in net ecosystem carbon stock 12 or 39 years after planting.