Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis with D-dimer adjusted to clinical probability: prospective diagnostic management study. (15th February 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis with D-dimer adjusted to clinical probability: prospective diagnostic management study. (15th February 2022)
- Main Title:
- Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis with D-dimer adjusted to clinical probability: prospective diagnostic management study
- Authors:
- Kearon, Clive
de Wit, Kerstin
Parpia, Sameer
Schulman, Sam
Spencer, Frederick A
Sharma, Sangita
Afilalo, Marc
Kahn, Susan R
Le Gal, Gregoire
Shivakumar, Sudeep
Bates, Shannon M
Wu, Cynthia
Lazo-Langner, Alejandro
D'Aragon, Frédérick
Deshaies, Jean-François
Spadafora, Luciana
Julian, Jim A - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of a diagnostic algorithm for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) that uses clinical pretest probability based D-dimer thresholds to exclude DVT. Design: Prospective diagnostic management study. Setting: University based emergency departments or outpatient clinics in Canada. Participants: Patients with symptoms or signs of DVT. Intervention: DVT was considered excluded without further testing by Wells low clinical pretest probability and D-dimer <1000 ng/mL or Wells moderate clinical pretest probability and D-dimer <500 ng/mL. All other patients had proximal ultrasound imaging. Repeat proximal ultrasonography was restricted to patients with initially negative ultrasonography, low or moderate clinical pretest probability, and D-dimer >3000 ng/mL or high clinical pretest probability and D-dimer >1500 ng/mL. If DVT was not diagnosed, patients did not receive anticoagulant treatment. Main outcome measure: Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at three months. Results: 1508 patients were enrolled and analysed, of whom 173 (11.5%) had DVT on scheduled diagnostic testing. Of the 1275 patients with no proximal DVT on scheduled testing who did not receive anticoagulant treatment, eight (0.6%, 95% confidence interval 0.3% to 1.2%) were found to have venous thromboembolism during follow-up. Compared with a traditional DVT testing strategy, this diagnostic approach reduced the need for ultrasonography from a mean of 1.36 scans/patient toAbstract: Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of a diagnostic algorithm for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) that uses clinical pretest probability based D-dimer thresholds to exclude DVT. Design: Prospective diagnostic management study. Setting: University based emergency departments or outpatient clinics in Canada. Participants: Patients with symptoms or signs of DVT. Intervention: DVT was considered excluded without further testing by Wells low clinical pretest probability and D-dimer <1000 ng/mL or Wells moderate clinical pretest probability and D-dimer <500 ng/mL. All other patients had proximal ultrasound imaging. Repeat proximal ultrasonography was restricted to patients with initially negative ultrasonography, low or moderate clinical pretest probability, and D-dimer >3000 ng/mL or high clinical pretest probability and D-dimer >1500 ng/mL. If DVT was not diagnosed, patients did not receive anticoagulant treatment. Main outcome measure: Symptomatic venous thromboembolism at three months. Results: 1508 patients were enrolled and analysed, of whom 173 (11.5%) had DVT on scheduled diagnostic testing. Of the 1275 patients with no proximal DVT on scheduled testing who did not receive anticoagulant treatment, eight (0.6%, 95% confidence interval 0.3% to 1.2%) were found to have venous thromboembolism during follow-up. Compared with a traditional DVT testing strategy, this diagnostic approach reduced the need for ultrasonography from a mean of 1.36 scans/patient to 0.72 scans/patient (difference −0.64, 95% confidence interval −0.68 to −0.60), corresponding to a relative reduction of 47%. Conclusions: The diagnostic strategy using a combination of clinical pretest probability and D-dimer identified a group of patients at low risk for DVT during follow-up while substantially reducing the need for ultrasound imaging. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02038530 . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ. Volume 376(2022)
- Journal:
- BMJ
- Issue:
- Volume 376(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 376, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 376
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0376-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-02-15
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine
Periodicals
610 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/09598138.html ↗
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/3/ ↗
http://www.bmj.com/bmj/ ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmj-2021-067378 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1447
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20829.xml