Serious incidents in testicular torsion management in England, 2007–2019: optimizing individual and training factors are the key to improved outcomes. (30th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Menzies‐Wilson, Richard; Folkard, Samuel S.; Sevdalis, Nick; Green, James S.A.
• Is Part Of: BJU international. Volume 129:Number 2(2022)
• Page Start: 249
• Page End: 257
• Publication Date: 2021-04-30
• Subjects: testicular -- torsion -- orchidectomy -- serious -- incident -- #Urology -- training; Genitourinary organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Genitourinary organs -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Urology -- Periodicals; 616.6
• DOI: 10.1111/bju.15414
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1464-4096

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To establish the healthcare factors that contribute to testicular torsion adverse events (orchidectomies) and 'near misses'. The secondary objective was to identify areas suitable for impactful quality improvement initiatives to be undertaken by National Health Service (NHS) healthcare providers nationally. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective record review and analysis, carried out in four phases. We applied the well‐validated London Protocol patient safety incident analysis framework to all eligible serious incidents related to testicular torsion submitted by English NHS Trusts over a 12‐year period to the Strategic Executive Information System database. Clinical reviewers established the incident population (Phase 1), were trained and piloted the feasibility of using the London Protocol (Phase 2), applied the protocol and themed the identified contributing factors linked to adverse events (orchidectomies) and near‐misses (Phase 3), and reviewed the evidence for improvement interventions (Phase 4). Results: Our search returned 992 serious incidents, of which 732 were eligible for study inclusion and analysis. Of those, 137 resulted in orchidectomies, equivalent to one serious incident resulting in orchidectomy per month, and 595 were near misses. Factors contributing to all incidents were: individual staff/training (38%); team (18%); work environment (16%); task and technology (14%); and institutional context (13%). Subgroup analysis of incidents resulting in orchidectomies vs near misses demonstrated a different pattern of factors, with individual staff/training factors significantly more prominent: individual/training (88%); work environment (8%); and task and technology (1%). No evidenced improvement interventions were found in the literature. Conclusion: This is the first study to our knowledge to systematically analyse and classify factors that are associated with loss of a testicle and related near‐miss incidents in patients presenting with testicular torsion. In England, a significant number of orchidectomies occur annually as a consequence of healthcare serious incidents. In order to improve outcomes, we propose clinical support to aid the diagnosis of torsion, improved national clinical guidelines, development of specific standard operating procedures and (in the longer term) more exposure of trainees and medical students to urology to improve the testicular salvage rate.