Bridging the gap: A new integrated early intervention service for young people with complex mental health issues. Issue 2 (4th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: White, Caitlin; Nash, Louise; Karageorge, Aspasia; van der Pol, Renae; Hunt, Glenn E.; Hamilton, Blake; Isobel, Sophie
• Is Part Of: Early intervention in psychiatry. Volume 16:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 186
• Page End: 194
• Publication Date: 2021-05-04
• Subjects: early intervention -- model of care -- service development -- ultra high risk for psychosis -- youth mental health; Mental health -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Research -- Periodicals; Mental illness -- Prevention -- Research -- Periodicals; Mental illness -- Treatment -- Research -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1111/eip.13152
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-7885

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Two integrated headspace Early Intervention Teams (hEITs) were established in 2017 to bridge gaps between headspace, the national primary care youth mental health programme in Australia, and the state funded secondary and tertiary mental health services. This study aims to describe functioning and outcomes of patients referred to hEIT over a 6‐month period. Methods: A retrospective file audit was conducted for all patients accepted into the service over a 6‐month period in 2018. Measures of distress, functioning and client satisfaction were collected and analysed. Exemplar vignettes were created to construct hypothetical examples and illustrate research findings. Results: At admission, the three most common presentations were depression/anxiety, trauma and stress related, and psychotic disorders. During their time in the service, young people displayed a statistically significant improvement in functioning, reduction in self‐harm in those 18 years and under, and a trend to reduction in distress scores. hEIT delivered a broad range of services covering social, occupational, educational, medical and mental health care, and the service was experienced positively by the patient cohort. Conclusions: hEIT appears to meet the needs of young people requiring greater care than primary care services can deliver. The integrated, wrap‐around care coordination facilitates treatments across social, educational and health domains. Further exploration of young people who disengage from care, improved outcome data reporting and economic evaluation are indicated.