Development methodologies for ontology‐based knowledge management systems: A review. Issue 2 (26th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mora, Manuel; Wang, Fen; Gómez, Jorge Marx; Phillips‐Wren, Gloria
• Other Names: Wu Desheng Dash guestEditor.; Hall Jon guestEditor.; Belezamo Baloka guestEditor.; Eken Süleyman guestEditor.; Avci Cafer guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Expert systems. Volume 39:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-10-26
• Subjects: CommonKADS -- comprehensive and systematic OKMS development methodologies -- ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015 standard -- NeON -- XDM; Expert systems (Computer science); 006.33
• DOI: 10.1111/exsy.12851
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0266-4720

Abstract

Abstract: Knowledge management systems (KMS) are computer‐based systems highly valued in business organizations because they support knowledge management (KM) processes. Most KMS have been developed using non‐intelligent computer technology—that is, DMS, CMS, DBMS, and CIS—, and thus, they cannot provide advanced capabilities. Consequently, enhanced KMS using intelligent technologies of ontologies with inference engines—called ontology‐based knowledge management systems (OKMS)—have been proposed in the last three decades. Nowadays, however, the implementation of OKMS in real‐world settings is still scarce. Lack of comprehensive and systematic development methodologies including Project Management and Technical Systems Engineering processes—as the Systems and Software Systems Engineering standards propose—have been suggested as a factor that inhibits OKMS implementations. In this study, we review the OKMS literature (1990–2021 period)—from six seminal studies located using a research search engine—to assess OKMS development methodologies that can be considered comprehensive and systematic. Five methodologies were identified and assessed using an evaluation subset from the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015 Systems and Software Engineering standard. Two of them—CommonKADS and NeON—were found with a high comprehensive and systematic level and both are suggested for organizations interested in OKMS implementations, but none of them qualified as agile, which is a current development approach for systems and software systems. Hence, further empirical research toward the realization of comprehensive and systematic OKMSs development methodologies, including agile versions, is suggested for fostering the implementation of OKMS in real‐world settings.