Pain that only she must bear: on the invisibility of women in judicial abortion rhetoric. Issue 1 (16th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Laguardia, F
• Is Part Of: Journal of law and the biosciences. Volume 9:Issue 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-03-16
• Subjects: abortion -- bodily integrity -- pain -- pregnancy -- sacrifice -- substantive due process; Life sciences -- Law and legislation -- Periodicals; Science and law -- Periodicals; Law and biology -- Periodicals; Biotechnology -- Law and legislation -- Periodicals; Bioethics -- Periodicals; 344.0957
• DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsac003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2053-9711

Abstract

Abstract: The graphic and bodily facts of a legal question of rights are relevant to the courts, particularly in questions that directly implicate physical bodies and pain, such as right to die cases, or what level of search may be allowable and when. However, in the case of abortion, or more specifically the bodily ramifications of pregnancy and childbirth, this detail is conspicuously absent. This article, relying on a content analysis of over 220 legal opinions on abortion rights, documents this absence of rhetoric. Particularly in the context of other discussions of pain and physical health risks in these very same cases, the complete absence of an acknowledgement of the bodily ramifications of pregnancy and childbirth appears purposeful, if perhaps not conscious. Reviewing prior literature on abortion rights and abortion rhetoric, it is likely that this lack of language both reflects and reinforces an assumption of women's roles as mothers, a general reluctance to acknowledge the totality of the sacrifices women make in giving birth, and the refusal to acknowledge women's individual interests as whole persons.