Effects of robot (SUBAR)-assisted gait training in patients with chronic stroke: Randomized controlled trial. Issue 48 (3rd December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kang, Cheon Ji; Chun, Min Ho; Lee, Junekyung; Lee, Ji Yeon
• Editors: Tu., Wen-Jun
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 100:Issue 48(2021)
• Page Start: e27974
• Publication Date: 2021-12-03
• Subjects: gait -- neurological rehabilitation -- robotics -- stroke; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027974
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Background: SUBAR is a new ground walking exoskeletal robot. The objective of this study is to investigate SUBAR-assisted gait training's effects in patients with chronic stroke. Methods: This preliminary study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. Thirty adults were enrolled 6 months after the onset of stroke with functional ambulation category scores ≥ 3. Patients were randomly assigned to receive robot-assisted gait training (SUBAR group, n = 15) or conventional physiotherapy (control group, n = 15). All patients received a total of 10 treatment sessions of 30 minutes each for 3 weeks. Before and after the 10-treatment sessions, patients were evaluated. The primary outcome is the 10 meter walk test and the secondary outcomes were the functional ambulation category scale, the Motricity Index-Lower, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), timed up and go, Rivermead Mobility Index, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and gait analysis. Results: In the SUBAR group, MAS and step length were significantly improved between pre- and posttreatment measurements (Δmean ± SD: −1.1 ± 1.6 and 5.5 ± 7.6, P = .019 and .016, respectively). The SUBAR group improved the stride length and step length of the affected limb but not significantly. The control group had significant improvements in the BBS, MAS, and stride length between pre- and posttreatment measurements (Δmean ± SD: 3.5 ± 4.6, −0.8 ± 1.5, and 6.5 ± 9.5; P = .004, .031, and .035, respectively). The BBS improved more in the control group than in the SUBAR group. There were no other differences between the SUBAR group and the control group. Conclusion: Our results suggest that SUBAR-assisted gait training improved gait parameters in patients with chronic stroke. However, there was no significant difference in most outcome measures compared to conventional physiotherapy. Further research is warranted to measure the effects of SUBAR-assisted gait training.