Time to OR for patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: A potential process measure to assess the quality of trauma care?. Issue 4 (6th April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thomas, Arielle C.; Campbell, Brendan T.; Subacius, Haris; Bilimoria, Karl Y.; Stey, Anne M.; Hamad, Doulia; Nasca, Brian; Nathens, Avery B.
• Is Part Of: Journal of trauma and acute care surgery. Volume 92:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 708
• Page End: 716
• Publication Date: 2022-04-06
• Subjects: Firearm -- trauma care quality -- quality improvement -- trauma epidemiology; Surgical intensive care -- Periodicals; Surgical emergencies -- Periodicals; Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.026
• DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003511
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2163-0755

Abstract

Abstract : "We studied patient and hospital characteristics associated with time to OR. Quicker time to the operating room for serious abdominal trauma is associated with level 1 status, university teaching hospitals, and greater institutional and surgeon experience with these patients." Abstract : BACKGROUND: Abdominal gunshot wounds (GSWs) require rapid assessment and operative intervention to reduce the risk of death and complications. We sought to determine if time to the operating room (OR) might be a useful process measure for the assessment of trauma care quality. We evaluated the facility benchmark time to OR for patients with serious injury and whether this was associated with lower rates of complications and mortality. METHODS: We evaluated time to OR for adult patients with an abdominal GSW presenting in shock to American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program centers from 2015 to 2020. We calculated the 75th percentile time to the OR for each center and characterized centers as average, slow, or fast. We compared patient and facility characteristics across outlier status, as well as risk-adjusted complications and mortality using hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: There were 4, 027 patients in 230 centers that met the inclusion criteria. Mortality was 28%. There were 61 (27%) fast and 52 (23%) slow centers. The median time for slow centers was 83 minutes (68–94 minutes) compared with fast centers, 35 minutes (32–38 minutes). Injury Severity Score and emergency department vital signs were similar across centers. Fast hospitals had higher total case volumes, more cases per surgeon, and were more likely to be Level I centers. Patients cared for in these centers had similar risk-adjusted rates of complications and mortality. CONCLUSION: Time to OR for patients with abdominal GSWs and shock might be a useful process measure to evaluate rapid decision making and OR access. Surgeon and center experience as measured by annual case volumes, coupled with a rapid surgical response required through Level I trauma center standards might be contributory. There was no association between outlier status and complications or mortality suggesting other factors apart from time to the OR are of greater significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level IV. Abstract :