Occupational Contact Dermatitis in Dental Personnel: A Retrospective Analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001 to 2018. Issue 1 (January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Warshaw, Erin M.; Ruggiero, Jenna L.; Atwater, Amber R.; DeKoven, Joel G.; Zug, Kathryn A.; Reeder, Margo J.; Silverberg, Jonathan I.; Taylor, James S.; Pratt, Melanie D.; Maibach, Howard I.; Houle, Marie-Claude; Belsito, Donald V.; Fowler, Joseph F.; Dunnick, Cory A.; DeLeo, Vincent A.; Sasseville, Denis; Fransway, Anthony F.
• Is Part Of: Dermatitis. Volume 33:Issue 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-01
• Subjects: Skin -- Inflammation -- Periodicals; Skin -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Dermatology -- Periodicals; Dermatitis, Contact -- Periodicals; Dermatitis, Atopic -- Periodicals; Dermatitis, Occupational -- Periodicals; Drug Eruptions -- Periodicals; 616.51
• DOI: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000847
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1710-3568

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Dental personnel are at risk of developing occupational contact dermatitis. Objectives: The aims of the study were to determine prevalence of occupational contact dermatitis in dental personnel referred for patch testing and to characterize relevant allergens and sources. Methods: The study used a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) data, 2001–2018. Results: Of 41, 109 patients, 585 (1.4%) were dental personnel. Dental personnel were significantly more likely than nondental personnel to be female (75.7% vs 67.4%, P < 0.0001), have occupationally related dermatitis (35.7% vs 11.5%, P < 0.0001), and/or have primary hand involvement (48.6% vs 22.5%, P < 0.0001). More than one quarter of dental personnel (62/585, 27.7%) had 1 or more occupationally related allergic patch test reaction(s). There were 249 occupationally related reactions to NACDG screening allergens, most commonly glutaraldehyde (18.1%), thiuram mix (16.1%), and carba mix (14.1%). The most common sources of NACDG screening allergens were gloves (30.7%), dental materials (26.6%), and sterilizing solutions (13.1%). Seventy-three dental personnel (12.5%) had 1 or more positive patch test reactions to occupationally related allergen(s)/substances not on the screening series. Occupationally related irritant contact dermatitis was identified in 22.2% (n = 130) of dental personnel, most commonly to nonskin soaps/detergents/disinfectants (32.0%). Conclusions: Occupational contact dermatitis is common in dental personnel referred for patch testing. Comprehensive testing beyond screening series is important in these patients.