Dose-dependent effects of high intensity focused ultrasound on compound action potentials in an ex vivo rodent peripheral nerve model: comparison to local anesthetics. Issue 4 (3rd February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Anderson, Thomas Anthony; Delgado, Jorge; Sun, Sharon; Behzadian, Negin; Vilches-Moure, Jose; Szlavik, Robert B; Butts-Pauly, Kim; Yeomans, David
• Is Part Of: Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Volume 47:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 242
• Page End: 248
• Publication Date: 2022-02-03
• Subjects: analgesia -- pain management -- pain -- postoperative -- regional anesthesia -- technology; Conduction anesthesia -- Periodicals; Pain medicine -- Periodicals; 617.964
• DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-103115
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1098-7339

Abstract

Abstract : Background: In animal models, focused ultrasound can reversibly or permanently inhibit nerve conduction, suggesting a potential role in managing pain. We hypothesized focused ultrasound's effects on action potential parameters may be similar to those of local anesthetics. Methods: In an ex vivo rat sciatic nerve model, action potential amplitude, area under the curve, latency to 10% peak, latency to 100% peak, rate of rise, and half peak width changes were assessed after separately applying increasing focused ultrasound pressures or concentrations of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Focused ultrasound's effects on nerve structure were examined histologically. Results: Increasing focused ultrasound pressures decreased action potential amplitude, area under the curve, and rate of rise, increased latency to 10% peak, and did not change latency to 100% peak or half peak width. Increasing local anesthetic concentrations decreased action potential amplitude, area under the curve, and rate of rise and increased latency to 10% peak, latency to 100% peak, and half peak width. At the highest focused ultrasound pressures, nerve architecture was altered compared with controls. Discussion: While some action potential parameters were altered comparably by focused ultrasound and local anesthetics, there were small but notable differences. It is not evident if these differences may lead to differences in clinical pain effects when focused ultrasound is applied in vivo or if focused ultrasound pressures that result in clinically relevant changes damage nerve structures. Given the potential advantages of a non-invasive technique for managing pain conditions, further investigation may be warranted in an in vivo pain model.