"Negotiated Coexistence": Indian and Chinese Engagement in the Global Governance of Peacebuilding. Issue 1 (9th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Adhikari, Monalisa
• Is Part Of: International studies review. Volume 24:Issue 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-03-09
• Subjects: changing global order -- emerging powers -- peacebuilding -- Palabras clave -- orden mundial en cambio -- potencias emergentes -- consolidación de la paz -- Mots clés -- changement de l'ordre mondial -- puissances émergentes -- consolidation de la paix; International relations -- Periodicals; World politics -- Periodicals; 320.05
• DOI: 10.1093/isr/viac012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1521-9488

Abstract

Abstract: A much-discussed theme in international relations is how emerging powers will engage with the declining liberal world order and its various governance regimes. This article examines the engagement of emergent powers with the regime of "peacebuilding." Empirically, it examines the interaction between India and China, with liberal peacebuilding projects in the peace processes of Nepal and Myanmar respectively. Departing from the theory that emergent powers either displace, or converge with, the liberal world order, this article argues that emergent powers have a "negotiated coexistence" with liberal peacebuilders. Despite competing motivations, this "coexistence" of liberal peacebuilders and emergent powers is negotiated, first, by the agency of conflict-affected states, who invoke plural forms of international engagement, to gain strategic advantage, and secondly, by limited interaction between the two, given the differences in their priorities and modalities of engagement. The differences ensure that emergent powers operate in parallel, yet distinctly, from peacebuilders, rarely crossing each other's path. This limited interaction not only prevents this coexistence from degenerating into instances of potential contestation but also inhibits cooperation. Yet, when emergent powers view their economic and strategic interests being threatened by norms and practices of liberal peacebuilding projects, few instances of contestation emerge.