Synergies between centralized and federated approaches to data quality: a report from the national COVID cohort collaborative. (2nd November 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Synergies between centralized and federated approaches to data quality: a report from the national COVID cohort collaborative. (2nd November 2021)
- Main Title:
- Synergies between centralized and federated approaches to data quality: a report from the national COVID cohort collaborative
- Authors:
- Pfaff, Emily R
Girvin, Andrew T
Gabriel, Davera L
Kostka, Kristin
Morris, Michele
Palchuk, Matvey B
Lehmann, Harold P
Amor, Benjamin
Bissell, Mark
Bradwell, Katie R
Gold, Sigfried
Hong, Stephanie S
Loomba, Johanna
Manna, Amin
McMurry, Julie A
Niehaus, Emily
Qureshi, Nabeel
Walden, Anita
Zhang, Xiaohan Tanner
Zhu, Richard L
Moffitt, Richard A
Haendel, Melissa A
Chute, Christopher G
Adams, William G
Al-Shukri, Shaymaa
Anzalone, Alfred
Baghal, Ahmad
Bennett, Tellen D
Bernstam, Elmer V
Bernstam, Elmer V
Bissell, Mark M
Bush, Brian
Campion, Thomas R
Castro, Victor
Chang, Jack
Chaudhari, Deepa D
Chen, Wenjin
Chu, San
Cimino, James J
Crandall, Keith A
Crooks, Mark
Davies, Sara J Deakyne
DiPalazzo, John
Dorr, David
Eckrich, Dan
Eltinge, Sarah E
Fort, Daniel G
Golovko, George
Gupta, Snehil
Haendel, Melissa A
Hajagos, Janos G
Hanauer, David A
Harnett, Brett M
Horswell, Ronald
Huang, Nancy
Johnson, Steven G
Kahn, Michael
Khanipov, Kamil
Kieler, Curtis
Luzuriaga, Katherine Ruiz De
Maidlow, Sarah
Martinez, Ashley
Mathew, Jomol
McClay, James C
McMahan, Gabriel
Melancon, Brian
Meystre, Stephane
Miele, Lucio
Morizono, Hiroki
Pablo, Ray
Patel, Lav
Phuong, Jimmy
Popham, Daniel J
Pulgarin, Claudia
Santos, Carlos
Sarkar, Indra Neil
Sazo, Nancy
Setoguchi, Soko
Soby, Selvin
Surampalli, Sirisha
Suver, Christine
Vangala, Uma Maheswara Reddy
Visweswaran, Shyam
Oehsen, James von
Walters, Kellie M
Wiley, Laura
Williams, David A
Zai, Adrian
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: In response to COVID-19, the informatics community united to aggregate as much clinical data as possible to characterize this new disease and reduce its impact through collaborative analytics. The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is now the largest publicly available HIPAA limited dataset in US history with over 6.4 million patients and is a testament to a partnership of over 100 organizations. Materials and Methods: We developed a pipeline for ingesting, harmonizing, and centralizing data from 56 contributing data partners using 4 federated Common Data Models. N3C data quality (DQ) review involves both automated and manual procedures. In the process, several DQ heuristics were discovered in our centralized context, both within the pipeline and during downstream project-based analysis. Feedback to the sites led to many local and centralized DQ improvements. Results: Beyond well-recognized DQ findings, we discovered 15 heuristics relating to source Common Data Model conformance, demographics, COVID tests, conditions, encounters, measurements, observations, coding completeness, and fitness for use. Of 56 sites, 37 sites (66%) demonstrated issues through these heuristics. These 37 sites demonstrated improvement after receiving feedback. Discussion: We encountered site-to-site differences in DQ which would have been challenging to discover using federated checks alone. We have demonstrated that centralized DQ benchmarking reveals uniqueAbstract: Objective: In response to COVID-19, the informatics community united to aggregate as much clinical data as possible to characterize this new disease and reduce its impact through collaborative analytics. The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) is now the largest publicly available HIPAA limited dataset in US history with over 6.4 million patients and is a testament to a partnership of over 100 organizations. Materials and Methods: We developed a pipeline for ingesting, harmonizing, and centralizing data from 56 contributing data partners using 4 federated Common Data Models. N3C data quality (DQ) review involves both automated and manual procedures. In the process, several DQ heuristics were discovered in our centralized context, both within the pipeline and during downstream project-based analysis. Feedback to the sites led to many local and centralized DQ improvements. Results: Beyond well-recognized DQ findings, we discovered 15 heuristics relating to source Common Data Model conformance, demographics, COVID tests, conditions, encounters, measurements, observations, coding completeness, and fitness for use. Of 56 sites, 37 sites (66%) demonstrated issues through these heuristics. These 37 sites demonstrated improvement after receiving feedback. Discussion: We encountered site-to-site differences in DQ which would have been challenging to discover using federated checks alone. We have demonstrated that centralized DQ benchmarking reveals unique opportunities for DQ improvement that will support improved research analytics locally and in aggregate. Conclusion: By combining rapid, continual assessment of DQ with a large volume of multisite data, it is possible to support more nuanced scientific questions with the scale and rigor that they require. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Volume 29:Number 4(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Number 4(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 4 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0029-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 609
- Page End:
- 618
- Publication Date:
- 2021-11-02
- Subjects:
- electronic health records -- data accuracy -- COVID-19
Medical informatics -- Periodicals
Information Services -- Periodicals
Medical Informatics -- Periodicals
Médecine -- Informatique -- Périodiques
Informatica
Geneeskunde
Informatique médicale
Computer network resources
Electronic journals
610.285 - Journal URLs:
- http://jamia.bmj.com/ ↗
http://www.jamia.org ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=76 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10675027 ↗
http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/en/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/jamia/ocab217 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1067-5027
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4689.025000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20732.xml