Prolonged patient survival after implementation of a continuous quality improvement programme empowered by digital transformation in a large dialysis network. Issue 3 (21st April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Garbelli, Mario; Ion Titapiccolo, Jasmine; Bellocchio, Francesco; Stuard, Stefano; Brancaccio, Diego; Neri, Luca
• Is Part Of: Nephrology dialysis transplantation. Volume 37:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 469
• Page End: 476
• Publication Date: 2021-04-21
• Subjects: clinical governance -- continuous quality improvement -- dialysis -- digital transformation -- end-stage renal disease -- survival; Nephrology -- Periodicals; Hemodialysis -- Periodicals; Kidneys -- Transplantation -- Periodicals; Hemodialysis; Kidneys -- Transplantation; Nephrology; Periodicals; 616.61
• DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfab160
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0931-0509

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Treatment of end-stage kidney disease patients is extremely challenging given the interconnected functional derangements and comorbidities characterizing the disease. Continuous quality improvement (CQI) in healthcare is a structured clinical governance process helping physicians adhere to best clinical practices. The digitization of patient medical records and data warehousing technologies has standardized and enhanced the efficiency of the CQI's evidence generation process. There is limited evidence that ameliorating intermediate outcomes would translate into better patient-centred outcomes. We sought to evaluate the relationship between Fresenius Medical Care medical patient review CQI (MPR-CQI) implementation and patients' survival in a large historical cohort study. Methods: We included all incident adult patients with 6-months survival on chronic dialysis registered in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region between 2011 and 2018. We compared medical key performance indicator (KPI) target achievements and 2-year mortality for patients enrolled prior to and after MPR-CQI policy onset (Cohorts A and B). We adopted a structural equation model where MPR-CQI policy was the exogenous explanatory variable, KPI target achievements was the mediator variable and survival was the outcome of interest. Results: About 4270 patients (Cohort A: 2397; Cohort B: 1873) met the inclusion criteria. We observed an increase in KPI target achievements after MPR-CQI policy implementation. Mediation analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality due to an indirect effect of MPR-CQI implementation through improvement in KPI target achievement occurring in the post-implementation era [odds ratio 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.65–0.76); P < 0.0001]. Conclusions: Our study suggests that MPR-CQI achieved by standardized clinical practice and periodic structured MPR may improve patients' survival through improvement in medical KPIs.