Comparison of different biomass methodologies to adjust sales data on veterinary antimicrobials in the USA. (23rd December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bulut, Ece; Ivanek, Renata
• Is Part Of: Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. Volume 77:Number 3(2022)
• Page Start: 827
• Page End: 842
• Publication Date: 2021-12-23
• Subjects: Anti-infective agents -- Periodicals; Chemotherapy -- Periodicals; 615.58
• DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab441
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-7453

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The United States (US) FDA, European Surveillance of Veterinary Antimicrobial Consumption (ESVAC), Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) established methodologies that characterize antimicrobial sales for use in food animals by adjusting the sales by animal biomass. Our aim was to review and compare these methodologies on US-specific data. Methods: Annual antimicrobial sales for cattle, swine, chickens and turkeys in the USA between 2016 and 2018 were adjusted by the FDA, ESVAC, PHAC and OIE methodologies. To better understand the advantages and disadvantages of the four methodologies, their biomass denominators were compared regarding the level of detail accounted for in the estimated US livestock biomass, their ability to observe temporal trends in animal biomass within a country and practicality in biomass estimation for comparing antimicrobial sales across countries. Results: The four methodologies resulted in substantially different estimates of biomass-adjusted antimicrobial sales for use in US food animals. The 2018 estimates were the highest with the ESVAC methodology (314.7 mg of active antimicrobial ingredient/kg of animal biomass), followed by PHAC (191.5 mg/kg), FDA (127.6 mg/kg) and OIE (111.5 mg/kg). The animal weight parameters used in each methodology had the most impact on the biomass-adjusted sales estimates. Conclusions: In regard to the estimation of the animal biomass, no methodology was found to be perfect; however, the FDA methodology had the best resolution in characterizing the US livestock biomass while the OIE methodology was best for biomass estimation for global monitoring of antimicrobial sales for use in food animals.