Test–Retest Reliability of Remote ImPACT Administration. (16th July 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Test–Retest Reliability of Remote ImPACT Administration. (16th July 2021)
- Main Title:
- Test–Retest Reliability of Remote ImPACT Administration
- Authors:
- Netzel, Lauren
Moran, Ryan
Hopfe, Dustin
Salvatore, Anthony P
Brown, Warren
Murray, Nicholas G - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the performance and test–retest reliability obtained when administering a computerized baseline neurocognitive exam to NCAA Division I student-athletes in a controlled laboratory setting versus an uncontrolled remote location. Method: A sample of 129 (female = 100) Division I student-athletes completed Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) pre-season assessments for two distinct and respective sports seasons in a controlled laboratory environment and an uncontrolled remote environment. Depending on the environment, participants were given verbal (controlled) or written (uncontrolled) guidelines for taking the test. Results: Multivariate repeated-measures ANOVA's determined that there were no within-subject differences between testing environments on ImPACT composite scores and cognitive efficiency index (CEI). The Chi-square test did not find any significant differences in impulse control or the number of invalid test scores, as determined by ImPACT, between environments. Intraclass correlations found the ImPACT subtest scores to range in test–retest reliability across testing environments, demonstrating moderate (verbal memory composite, r = 0.46; visual memory composite, r = 0.64; reaction time, r = 0.61; impulse control, r = 0.52; and CEI, r = 0.61) and good (visual motor composite, r = 0.77) test–retest reliability. Conclusions: Results indicate that ImPACT is reliable between controlled andAbstract: Objective: To evaluate the performance and test–retest reliability obtained when administering a computerized baseline neurocognitive exam to NCAA Division I student-athletes in a controlled laboratory setting versus an uncontrolled remote location. Method: A sample of 129 (female = 100) Division I student-athletes completed Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) pre-season assessments for two distinct and respective sports seasons in a controlled laboratory environment and an uncontrolled remote environment. Depending on the environment, participants were given verbal (controlled) or written (uncontrolled) guidelines for taking the test. Results: Multivariate repeated-measures ANOVA's determined that there were no within-subject differences between testing environments on ImPACT composite scores and cognitive efficiency index (CEI). The Chi-square test did not find any significant differences in impulse control or the number of invalid test scores, as determined by ImPACT, between environments. Intraclass correlations found the ImPACT subtest scores to range in test–retest reliability across testing environments, demonstrating moderate (verbal memory composite, r = 0.46; visual memory composite, r = 0.64; reaction time, r = 0.61; impulse control, r = 0.52; and CEI, r = 0.61) and good (visual motor composite, r = 0.77) test–retest reliability. Conclusions: Results indicate that ImPACT is reliable between controlled and uncontrolled testing environments. This further suggests that ImPACT can be administered in a remote environment, pending specific adherence to testing instructions, or in the event of social distancing or isolation policies. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Archives of clinical neuropsychology. Volume 37:Number 2(2022)
- Journal:
- Archives of clinical neuropsychology
- Issue:
- Volume 37:Number 2(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 37, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0037-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 449
- Page End:
- 456
- Publication Date:
- 2021-07-16
- Subjects:
- executive functions -- assessment -- everyday functioning -- head injury -- traumatic brain injury -- perceptional/spatial processing -- mild cognitive impairment
Clinical neuropsychology -- Periodicals
616.805 - Journal URLs:
- http://acn.oxfordjournals.org/?code=acn&.cgifields=code&homepage.x=152&homepage.y=14 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/08876177 ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/arclin/acab055 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0887-6177
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1634.090000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20749.xml