Personality, Success, and Beyond: The Layperson's Perception of Patients With Facial Transplantation. Issue 2 (22nd March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abousy, Mya; Jenny, Hillary E.; Xun, Helen; Khavanin, Nima; Creighton, Francis; Byrne, Patrick; Cooney, Damon; Redett, Richard; Yang, Robin
• Is Part Of: Journal of craniofacial surgery. Volume 33:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 385
• Page End: 389
• Publication Date: 2022-03-22
• Subjects: Face transplant -- face transplantation -- perceptions -- psychosocial -- public perceptions -- vascularized composite allotransplantation; Facial bones -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Skull -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.52
• DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008297
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-2275

Abstract

Abstract : Background: While the goal of facial vascularized composite allotransplantation (FVCA) is to provide patients with improved physical and social function, no study has evaluated layperson perception of social acceptance and perceived career success of patients with FVCA. The purpose of this study was to determine how FVCA changes social acceptance and perceived career success of patients with facial disfiguration. Methods: Eight hundred fifteen laypersons were surveyed through Mechanical Turk to evaluate their perceptions of patients with FVCA. Respondents were shown facial photographs of patients pre-FVCA, post-FVCA, and matched controls and evaluated these photos on 26 items of perceived social acceptance and career success. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Both male and female post-FVCA photos were perceived as significantly more socially accepted and professionally successful than their pre-FVCA photos in at least 21 out of 26 items ( P < 0.001 for all), but the posttransplant patients scored lower than their control in at least 25 out of 26 items ( P < 0.001 for all). Additionally, there were discrepancies in findings based on patient gender. Conclusions: This study suggests that while FVCA has a significantly positive impact on social acceptance and perceived professional success, it does not fully reinstate these qualities. Furthermore, varying surgical outcomes and/or cognitive biases (such as gender) may impact perceptions of the individual by the public. Our findings suggest a need to standardize practices to better predict and improve outcomes and encourage surgeons to consider patient factors such as gender when planning these procedures.