Ageism in Working Life: A Scoping Review on Discursive Approaches. (31st August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Previtali, Federica; Keskinen, Katri; Niska, Miira; Nikander, Pirjo
• Editors: Heyn, Patricia C
• Is Part Of: Gerontologist. Volume 62:Number 2(2022)
• Page Start: e97
• Page End: e111
• Publication Date: 2020-08-31
• Subjects: Aging policies -- Discourses -- Older–younger workers -- Workforce; Older people -- Periodicals; Older people -- United States -- Periodicals; 305.2605
• DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa119
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-9013

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Objectives: This review investigates the contribution of discursive approaches to the study of ageism in working life. It looks back on the 50 years of research on ageism and the body of research produced by the discursive turn in social science and gerontology. Research Design and Methods: This study followed the 5-step scoping review protocol to define gaps in the knowledge on ageism in working life from a discursive perspective. About 851 papers were extracted from electronic databases and, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 39 papers were included in the final review. Results: The selected articles were based on discursive approaches and included study participants along the full continuum of working life (workers, retirees, jobseekers, and students in training). Three main themes representing the focal point of research were identified, namely, experiences of ageism, social construction of age and ageism, and strategies to tackle (dilute) ageism. Discussion and Implications: Discursive research provides undeniable insights into how participants experience ageism in working life, how ageism is constructed, and how workers create context-based strategies to counteract age stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination. Discursive research on ageism in the working life needs further development about the variety of methods and data, the problematization of age-based labeling and grouping of workers, and a focus on the intersection between age and other social categories. Further research in these areas can deepen our understanding of how age and ageism are constructed and can inform policies about ways of disentangling them in working life.