Deleterious Mutations Accumulate Faster in Allopolyploid Than Diploid Cotton (Gossypium) and Unequally between Subgenomes. (31st January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Conover, Justin L; Wendel, Jonathan F
• Editors: Purugganan, Michael
• Is Part Of: Molecular biology and evolution. Volume 39:Number 2(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-01-31
• Subjects: polyploidy -- deleterious mutations -- purifying selection -- molecular evolution; Molecular biology -- Periodicals; Molecular evolution -- Periodicals; Evolution, Molecular -- Periodicals; Molecular Biology -- Periodicals; 572.8
• DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msac024
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0737-4038

Abstract

Abstract: Whole-genome duplication (polyploidization) is among the most dramatic mutational processes in nature, so understanding how natural selection differs in polyploids relative to diploids is an important goal. Population genetics theory predicts that recessive deleterious mutations accumulate faster in allopolyploids than diploids due to the masking effect of redundant gene copies, but this prediction is hitherto unconfirmed. Here, we use the cotton genus ( Gossypium ), which contains seven allopolyploids derived from a single polyploidization event 1–2 Million years ago, to investigate deleterious mutation accumulation. We use two methods of identifying deleterious mutations at the nucleotide and amino acid level, along with whole-genome resequencing of 43 individuals spanning six allopolyploid species and their two diploid progenitors, to demonstrate that deleterious mutations accumulate faster in allopolyploids than in their diploid progenitors. We find that, unlike what would be expected under models of demographic changes alone, strongly deleterious mutations show the biggest difference between ploidy levels, and this effect diminishes for moderately and mildly deleterious mutations. We further show that the proportion of nonsynonymous mutations that are deleterious differs between the two coresident subgenomes in the allopolyploids, suggesting that homoeologous masking acts unequally between subgenomes. Our results provide a genome-wide perspective on classic notions of the significance of gene duplication that likely are broadly applicable to allopolyploids, with implications for our understanding of the evolutionary fate of deleterious mutations. Finally, we note that some measures of selection (e.g., d N /d S, πN / π S ) may be biased when species of different ploidy levels are compared.