Classical and disease-specific quality indicators in glioma surgery—Development of a quality checklist to improve treatment quality in glioma patients. Issue 1 (11th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Menke, Christiane; Lohmann, Sebastian; Baehr, Andrea; Grauer, Oliver; Holling, Markus; Brokinkel, Benjamin; Schwake, Michael; Stummer, Walter; Schipmann, Stephanie
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology practice. Volume 9:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 59
• Page End: 67
• Publication Date: 2021-10-11
• Subjects: glioblastoma -- glioma -- quality indicators -- readmission -- reoperation; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481005
• DOI: 10.1093/nop/npab063
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2054-2577

Abstract

Abstract: Background: There is a pressing demand for more accurate, disease-specific quality measures in the field of neurosurgery. Aiming at most adequately measuring and reflecting the quality of glioma therapy, we developed a novel quality indicator bundle in form of a checklist for all patients that are treated operatively for glioma. Methods: On the basis of possible glioma-specific quality indicators retrieved from the literature and quality guidelines, a multidisciplinary team developed a checklist containing 13 patient-need-specific outcome measures. Subsequently, the checklist was prospectively applied to a total of 78 patients compared with a control group consisting of 322 patients. A score was generated based on the maximum of quality measures achieved. Results: Significant improvements in quality after prospectively introducing the checklist were achieved for supplemental physical and occupational therapy during inpatient stay (89.4% vs 100%, P = .002), consultation of a social worker during inpatient stay (64% vs 92.3%, P < .001), psycho-oncological screening (14.3% vs 70.5%, P < .001), psycho-oncological consultation (31.1% vs 82.1%, P < .001), and consultation of the palliative care team (20% vs 40%, P = .031). Overall, after introduction of the checklist one-third (n = 23) of patients reached best-practice measures in all categories, and over half of the patients (n = 44) achieved above 90% with respect to the outcome measures. Conclusions: Aiming at ensuring comprehensive, consistent, and timely care of glioma patients, the implementation of the checklist for routine use in glioma surgery represents an efficient, easily reproducible, and powerful tool for significant improvements.