Development and Validation of the Long Coronavirus Disease (COVID) Symptom and Impact Tools: A Set of Patient-Reported Instruments Constructed From Patients' Lived Experience. (29th April 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Development and Validation of the Long Coronavirus Disease (COVID) Symptom and Impact Tools: A Set of Patient-Reported Instruments Constructed From Patients' Lived Experience. (29th April 2021)
- Main Title:
- Development and Validation of the Long Coronavirus Disease (COVID) Symptom and Impact Tools: A Set of Patient-Reported Instruments Constructed From Patients' Lived Experience
- Authors:
- Tran, Viet-Thi
Riveros, Carolina
Clepier, Bérangère
Desvarieux, Moïse
Collet, Camille
Yordanov, Youri
Ravaud, Philippe - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: To develop and validate patient-reported instruments, based on patients' lived experiences, for monitoring the symptoms and impact of long coronavirus disease (covid). Methods: The long covid Symptom and Impact Tools (ST and IT) were constructed from the answers to a survey with open-ended questions to 492 patients with long COVID. Validation of the tools involved adult patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and symptoms extending over 3 weeks after onset. Construct validity was assessed by examining the relations of the ST and IT scores with health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), function (PCFS, post-COVID functional scale), and perceived health (MYMOP2, Measure yourself medical outcome profile 2). Reliability was determined by a test-retest. The "patient acceptable symptomatic state" (PASS) was determined by the percentile method. Results: Validation involved 1022 participants (55% with confirmed COVID-19, 79% female, and 12.5% hospitalized for COVID-19). The long COVID ST and IT scores were strongly correlated with the EQ-5D-5L (rs = −0.45 and rs = −0.59, respectively), the PCFS (rs = −0.39 and rs = −0.55), and the MYMOP2 (rs = −0.40 and rs = −0.59). Reproducibility was excellent with an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95% confidence interval .80 to .86) for the ST score and 0.84 (.80 to .87) for the IT score. In total, 793 (77.5%) patients reported an unacceptable symptomatic state, therebyAbstract: Background: To develop and validate patient-reported instruments, based on patients' lived experiences, for monitoring the symptoms and impact of long coronavirus disease (covid). Methods: The long covid Symptom and Impact Tools (ST and IT) were constructed from the answers to a survey with open-ended questions to 492 patients with long COVID. Validation of the tools involved adult patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and symptoms extending over 3 weeks after onset. Construct validity was assessed by examining the relations of the ST and IT scores with health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), function (PCFS, post-COVID functional scale), and perceived health (MYMOP2, Measure yourself medical outcome profile 2). Reliability was determined by a test-retest. The "patient acceptable symptomatic state" (PASS) was determined by the percentile method. Results: Validation involved 1022 participants (55% with confirmed COVID-19, 79% female, and 12.5% hospitalized for COVID-19). The long COVID ST and IT scores were strongly correlated with the EQ-5D-5L (rs = −0.45 and rs = −0.59, respectively), the PCFS (rs = −0.39 and rs = −0.55), and the MYMOP2 (rs = −0.40 and rs = −0.59). Reproducibility was excellent with an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95% confidence interval .80 to .86) for the ST score and 0.84 (.80 to .87) for the IT score. In total, 793 (77.5%) patients reported an unacceptable symptomatic state, thereby setting the PASS for the long covid IT score at 30 (28 to 33). Conclusions: The long covid ST and IT tools, constructed from patients' lived experiences, provide the first validated and reliable instruments for monitoring the symptoms and impact of long covid. Abstract : We developed the long COVID Symptom and Impact Tools from the experiences of 492 patients, captured during a survey with open-ended questions, and assessed their validity and reliability in a sample of 1022 patients with long COVID. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical infectious diseases. Volume 74:Number 2(2022)
- Journal:
- Clinical infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 74:Number 2(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 74, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 74
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0074-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 278
- Page End:
- 287
- Publication Date:
- 2021-04-29
- Subjects:
- patient-reported outcome -- COVID-19 -- long COVID
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://cid.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/10584838.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cid/ciab352 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1058-4838
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.293860
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20703.xml