Effect of a Biofeedback Intervention on Heart Rate Variability in Individuals With Panic Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Issue 2 (14th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Herhaus, Benedict; Siepmann, Martin; Kahaly, George J.; Conrad, Rupert; Petrowski, Katja
• Is Part Of: Psychosomatic medicine. Volume 84:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 199
• Page End: 209
• Publication Date: 2022-02-14
• Subjects: heart rate variability -- biofeedback -- 0.1 Hz breathing -- panic disorder -- randomized controlled trial -- ACQ = Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire -- ANOVA = analysis of variance -- ANS = autonomic nervous system -- ASI = Anxiety Sensitivity Index -- BDI = Beck Depression Inventory -- BF = biofeedback -- BSQ = Body Sensations Questionnaire -- ECG = electrocardiograph -- HF = power in high-frequency range 0.15–0.4 Hz -- HRV = heart rate variability -- LF = power in low-frequency range 0.04–0.15 Hz -- MI = Mobility Inventory -- PAS = Panic and Agoraphobia Scale -- PD = panic disorder -- RMSSD = root mean square successive differences -- SDNN = standard deviation of all NN intervals -- VLF = power in very low-frequency range 0.003–0.04 Hz; Medicine, Psychosomatic -- Periodicals; 616.0805
• DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001031
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0033-3174

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: Some individuals with panic disorder (PD) display reduced heart rate variability (HRV), which may result in an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. Heart rate variability–biofeedback (HRV-BF) training has been shown to improve the modulation of the autonomic activity. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate the effect of a 4-week HRV-BF intervention in individuals with PD. HRV-BF training improved the modulation of the autonomic activity. Therefore, with this randomized controlled trial, we aimed to investigate the effect of a 4-week HRV-BF intervention in people with PD. Methods: Thirty-six women and 16 men with PD (mean age = 35.85 [15.60] years) were randomly allocated either to HRV-BF with 0.1-Hz breathing as intervention group or to HRV-Sham-BF as active control group. HRV-BF was performed for 4 weeks, whereas HRV was measured both during a short-term resting condition and during a paced breathing condition before and after intervention. Results: HRV-BF with 0.1-Hz breathing increased HRV and reduced panic symptoms in individuals with PD. HRV-BF with 0.1-Hz breathing demonstrated an increase in the time and frequency domain parameters of HRV during the short-term resting condition (ΔPost-Pre root mean square successive differences: 5.87 [14.03] milliseconds; ΔPost-Pre standard deviation of all NN intervals: 11.63 [17.06] milliseconds; ΔPost-Pre total power: 464.88 [1825.47] milliseconds 2 ; ΔPost-Pre power in low-frequency range 0.04–0.15 Hz: 312.73 [592.71] milliseconds 2 ), a decrease in the heart rate during the paced breathing condition (ΔPost-Pre: −5.87 [9.14] beats/min), and a decrease in the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (ΔPost-Pre: −3.64 [6.30]). There was no intervention effect in the HRV-Sham-BF group. Conclusions: HRV-BF as a noninvasive and nonpharmacological treatment seems to be an important intervention option to improve reduced HRV and decrease panic symptoms in individuals with PD. Future studies are needed to establish whether these effects translate to reductions in the risk of cardiovascular disease in PD.