Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer. Issue 6 (December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer. Issue 6 (December 2021)
- Main Title:
- Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer
- Authors:
- Segarra-Vidal, Blanca
Dinoi, Giorgia
Zorrilla-Vaca, Andres
Mariani, Andrea
Student, Vladimir
Garcia, Nuria Agustí
Llueca Abella, Antonio
Ramirez, Pedro T. - Abstract:
- Abstract : OBJECTIVE: To compare disease-free survival between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS: We conducted a multicentric, propensity-matched study of patients with high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and staging between January 1999 and June 2016 at two centers. High-risk endometrial cancer included grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, undifferentiated carcinoma or carcinosarcoma with any myometrial invasion. Patients were categorized a priori into two groups based on surgical approach, propensity scores were calculated based on potential confounders and groups were matched 1:1 using nearest neighbor technique. Cox hazard regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated the association of surgical technique with survival. RESULTS: Of 626 eligible patients, 263 (42%) underwent minimally invasive surgery and 363 (58%) underwent open surgery. In the matched cohort, there were no differences in disease-free survival rates at 5 years between open (53.4% [95% CI 45.6–60.5%]) and minimally invasive surgery (54.6% [95% CI 46.6–61.8]; P =.82). Minimally invasive surgery was not associated with worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.63–1.16; P =.30), overall survival (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.73–1.48, P =.81), or recurrence rate (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.69–1.44; P =.99) compared with open surgery. Use of uterine manipulator was not associatedAbstract : OBJECTIVE: To compare disease-free survival between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS: We conducted a multicentric, propensity-matched study of patients with high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and staging between January 1999 and June 2016 at two centers. High-risk endometrial cancer included grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, undifferentiated carcinoma or carcinosarcoma with any myometrial invasion. Patients were categorized a priori into two groups based on surgical approach, propensity scores were calculated based on potential confounders and groups were matched 1:1 using nearest neighbor technique. Cox hazard regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated the association of surgical technique with survival. RESULTS: Of 626 eligible patients, 263 (42%) underwent minimally invasive surgery and 363 (58%) underwent open surgery. In the matched cohort, there were no differences in disease-free survival rates at 5 years between open (53.4% [95% CI 45.6–60.5%]) and minimally invasive surgery (54.6% [95% CI 46.6–61.8]; P =.82). Minimally invasive surgery was not associated with worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.63–1.16; P =.30), overall survival (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.73–1.48, P =.81), or recurrence rate (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.69–1.44; P =.99) compared with open surgery. Use of uterine manipulator was not associated with worse disease-free survival (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.65–1.58, P =.96), overall survival (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.71–1.96, P =.53), or recurrence rate (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.67–1.87; P =.66). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in oncologic outcomes comparing minimally invasive and open surgery among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. Abstract : There was no difference in disease-free survival, overall survival, and recurrence rate when comparing minimally invasive and open surgery among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 138:Issue 6(2021)
- Journal:
- Obstetrics and gynecology
- Issue:
- Volume 138:Issue 6(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 138, Issue 6 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 138
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0138-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004606 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0029-7844
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6208.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20684.xml