Study design flaws and statistical challenges in evaluating fertility treatments. Issue 2 (17th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wilkinson, Jack; Stocking, Katie
• Is Part Of: Reproduction & fertility. Volume 2:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: C9
• Page End: C21
• Publication Date: 2021-06-17
• Subjects: assisted reproduction -- reproductive medicine; Reproduction -- Periodicals; Reproduction -- Immunological aspects -- Periodicals; Reproductive health -- Periodicals; Fertility -- Periodicals; 571.8
• DOI: 10.1530/RAF-21-0015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2633-8386

Abstract

Abstract : Health interventions should be tested before being introduced into clinical practice, to find out whether they work and whether they are harmful. However, research studies will only provide reliable answers to these questions if they are appropriately designed and analysed. But these are not trivial tasks. We review some methodological challenges that arise when evaluating fertility interventions and explain the implications for a non-statistical audience. These include flexibility in outcomes and analyses; use of surrogate outcomes instead of live birth; use of inappropriate denominators; evaluating cumulative outcomes and time to live birth; allowing each patient or couple to contribute to a research study more than once. We highlight recurring errors and present solutions. We conclude by highlighting the importance of collaboration between clinical and methodological experts, as well as people with experience of subfertility, for realising high-quality research. Lay summary: We do research to find out whether fertility treatments are beneficial and to make sure they don't cause harm. However, research will only provide reliable answers if it is done properly. It is not unusual for researchers to make mistakes when they are designing research studies and analysing the data that we get from them. In this review, we describe some of the mistakes people make when they do research about fertility treatments and explain how to avoid them. These include challenges which arise due to the large number of things that can be measured and reported when looking to see if fertility treatments work; failure to check whether the treatment increases the number of live births; failing to include all study participants in calculations;challenges in studies where participants may have more than one treatment attempt. We conclude by highlighting the importance of collaboration between clinical and methodological experts, as well as people with experience of fertility problems.