Establishing the minimal clinically important difference for the PROMIS Physical domains in cervical deformity patients. (February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Passias, Peter G.; Pierce, Katherine E.; Williamson, Tyler; Naessig, Sara; Ahmad, Waleed; Passfall, Lara; Krol, Oscar; Kummer, Nicholas A.; Joujon-Roche, Rachel; Moattari, Kevin; Tretiakov, Peter; Imbo, Bailey; Maglaras, Constance; O'Connell, Brooke K.; Diebo, Bassel G.; Lafage, Renaud; Lafage, Virginie
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical neuroscience. Volume 96(2022)
• Page Start: 19
• Page End: 24
• Publication Date: 2022-02
• Subjects: Cervical deformity -- PROMIS -- HRQL -- MCID; Brain -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Brain -- surgery -- Periodicals; Neurosurgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.12.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0967-5868

Abstract

Highlights: Drawbacks of current metrics compel use of novel patient-reported outcome indices. This study developed MCID values for PROMIS, a novel patient-reported outcome metric. Greater deformity severity by TS-CL was associated with lower MCID thresholds. Abstract: Introduction: Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments have been shown to correlate with established patient outcome metrics. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the MCID for the PROMIS physical domains of Physical Function (PF), Pain Intensity (PI), and Pain Interference (Int) in a population of surgical cervical deformity (CD) patients. Methods: Surgical CD patients ≥ 18 years old with baseline (BL) and 3-month (3 M) HRQL data were isolated. Changes in HRQLs: ΔBL-3M. An anchor-based methodology was used. The cohort was divided into four groups: 'worse' (ΔEQ5D ≤ −0.12), 'unchanged' (≥0.12, but < −0.12), 'slightly improve' (>0.12, but ≤ 0.24), and 'markedly improved' (>0.24) [0.24 is the MCID for EQ5D]. PROMIS-PF, PI and Int at 3M was compared between 'slightly improved' and 'unchanged'. ROC computed discrete MCID values using the change in PROMIS that yielded the smallest difference between sensitivity ('slightly improved') and specificity ('unchanged'). We repeated anchor-based methods for the Ames-ISSG classification of severe deformity. Results: 140 patients were included. EQ5D groups: 9 patients 'worse', 53 'unchanged', 20 'slightly improved', and 57 'markedly improved'. Patients classified as 'unchanged' exhibited a PROMIS-PF improvement of 2.9 ± 17.0 and those 'slightly improved' had an average gain of 13.3 ± 17.8. ROC analysis for the PROMIS-PF demonstrated an MCID of +2.26, for PROMIS-PI of −5.5, and PROMIS-Int of −5.4. In the Ames-ISSG TS-CL severe CD modifier, ROC analysis found MCIDs of PROMIS physical domains: PF of +0.5, PI of −5.2, and Int of −5.4. Conclusions: MCID for PROMIS physical domains were established for a cervical deformity population. MCID in PROMIS Physical Function was significantly lower for patients with severe cervical deformity.