Polycentric structures nurturing adaptive food quality governance - Lessons learned from geographical indications in the European Union. (January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Penker, Marianne; Scaramuzzi, Silvia; Edelmann, Hanna; Belletti, Giovanni; Marescotti, Andrea; Casabianca, François; Quiñones-Ruiz, Xiomara F.
• Is Part Of: Journal of rural studies. Volume 89(2022)
• Page Start: 208
• Page End: 221
• Publication Date: 2022-01
• Subjects: Geographical indications -- Amendments -- Product specification -- Polycentric governance -- Food quality standards -- European Union; Sociology, Rural -- Periodicals; Country life -- Periodicals; Rural development -- Periodicals; Land use, Rural -- Planning -- Periodicals; Rural conditions -- Periodicals; Sociologie rurale -- Périodiques; Vie rurale -- Périodiques; Développement rural -- Périodiques; Sol, Utilisation agricole du -- Planification -- Périodiques; Conditions rurales -- Périodiques; Country life; Land use, Rural -- Planning; Rural conditions; Rural development; Sociology, Rural; Periodicals; 307.72
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.023
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0743-0167

Abstract

Abstract: In contrast to harmonised international food quality standards, local producers of food that is protected as geographical indication can adapt production rules. In a comparative multi-method case study approach, we analyse how constitutional and collective choice rules affect the negotiation of diverse interests and the adaptability of food quality standards in France, Italy and Austria. In France, a national organisation with a plurality of technical expertise guarantees the coherence of geographical indications based on notions of terroir and heritage. Italy's rural development approach secures very elaborated voting rules for producer groups and broader interaction on the regional level to accomplish broadly legitimated decisions. In the Austrian intellectual property rights approach, producers self-define the constitutional and collective choice rules and have the fullest autonomy and responsibility in standard setting. We conclude that polycentric interlinkages across scales and sectors – though delaying adaptation – support the long-term conservation of the products' identity via broad legitimisation. Both, the autonomy of local producers to innovatively adapt to change as well as a strong product identity are key for the long-term viability of geographical indications. Highlights: Novel framework for analysing adaptive food quality governance based on : constitutional, collective choice and operational rules. Rules and interactional patterns were linked to two criteria : coordination of diverse interests and food quality adaptability. Framework applied to three national schemes of GIs and the interactions of three producer groups amending product specifications. Three governance approaches: intellectual property rights approach, rural development approach, territorial heritage approach. Polycentric governance approaches support coordination of diverse interests and adaptation of food quality standards. Perspectives for research on adaptive food quality governance are suggested for GIs and other types of food quality standards.