Machine learning algorithms for soil moisture estimation using Sentinel-1: Model development and implementation. Issue 4 (15th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chaudhary, Sumit Kumar; Srivastava, Prashant K.; Gupta, Dileep Kumar; Kumar, Pradeep; Prasad, Rajendra; Pandey, Dharmendra Kumar; Das, Anup Kumar; Gupta, Manika
• Is Part Of: Advances in space research. Volume 69:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 1799
• Page End: 1812
• Publication Date: 2022-02-15
• Subjects: Sentinel-1 -- Artificial Intelligence -- Machine Learning Algorithms -- Soil Moisture -- Optimization; Space sciences -- Periodicals; Astronautics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 500.505
• DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.08.022
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0273-1177

Abstract

Abstract: The present study provided the first-time comprehensive evaluation of 12 advanced statistical and machine learning (ML) algorithms for the Soil Moisture (SM) estimation from dual polarimetric Sentinel-1 radar backscatter. The ML algorithms namely support vector machine (SVM) with linear, polynomial, radial and sigmoid kernel, random forest (RF), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), radial basis function (RBF), Wang and Mendel's (WM), subtractive clustering (SBC), adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), hybrid fuzzy interference system (HyFIS), and dynamic evolving neural fuzzy inference system (DENFIS) were used. Extensive field samplings were performed for collection of in-situ SM data and other parameters from the selected sites for seven different dates and at two different locations (Varanasi and Guntur District, India), concurrent to Sentinel-1 overpasses. The backscattering coefficients were considered as input variables and SM as output variable for the training, validation and testing of the ML algorithms. The site at Varanasi was used for the training, validation and testing of the models. On the other hand, the Guntur site was used as an independent site for checking the model performance, before finalizing the algorithms. The performances of different trained algorithms were evaluated in terms of correlation coefficient ( r ), root mean square error (RMSE) (in m 3 /m 3 ) and bias (in m 3 /m 3 ). The study identified the RF, SBC and ANFIS as the top three best performing models with comparable and promising SM estimation. In order to test the robustness of these best models (RF, SBC and ANFIS), further performance analysis was performed to the independent datasets of the Varanasi and Guntur test sites, which indicates that the performance of these three models were consistent and SBC can be recommended as the best among all for SM estimation.