Children are suboptimal in adapting motor exploration to task dimensionality during motor learning. (23rd January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lee, Mei-Hua; Patel, Priya; Ranganathan, Rajiv
• Is Part Of: Neuroscience letters. Volume 770(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-01-23
• Subjects: Motor exploration -- Motor learning -- Children -- Coordination -- Skill -- Age; Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Research -- Periodicals; Neurologie -- Périodiques; Neuroanatomie -- Périodiques; Neuropharmacologie -- Périodiques; Neurophysiologie -- Périodiques; Neurology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 617.48
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136355
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0304-3940

Abstract

Highlights: Children show lower task performance compared to adults when learning a 1D task. Coordination analyses indicated greater degree of exploration in children. Children show limited adaptability in matching exploration to task demands. Abstract: Motor learning in novel tasks requires exploration to find the appropriate coordination patterns to perform the task. Prior work has shown that compared to adults, children show limited exploration when learning a task that required using upper body movements to control a 2D cursor on a screen. Here, by changing the task dimensionality to 1D, we examined two competing hypotheses: whether children show limited exploration as a general strategy, or whether children are suboptimal in adapting their exploration to task dimensionality. Two groups of children (9- and 12-year olds), and one group of adults learned a virtual task that involved learning to control a cursor on the screen using movements of the upper body. Participants practiced the task for a single session with a total of 232 reaching movements. Results showed that 9-year olds show worse task performance relative to adults, as indicated by higher movement times and path lengths. Analysis of the coordination strategies indicated that both groups of children showed lower variance along the first principal component, suggesting that they had greater exploration than adults which was suboptimal for the 1D task. These results suggest that motor learning in children is characterized not by limited exploration per se, but by a limited adaptability in matching motor exploration to task dimensionality.