Impact of availability of catheter laboratory facilities on management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction presenting with out of hospital cardiac arrest. (January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of availability of catheter laboratory facilities on management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction presenting with out of hospital cardiac arrest. (January 2022)
- Main Title:
- Impact of availability of catheter laboratory facilities on management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction presenting with out of hospital cardiac arrest
- Authors:
- Dafaalla, Mohamed
Rashid, Muhammad
Sun, Louise
Quinn, Tom
Timmis, Adam
Wijeysundera, Harindra
Bagur, Rodrigo
Michos, Erin
Curzen, Nick
Mamas, Mamas A. - Abstract:
- Graphical abstract: Abstract: Objectives: We aimed to identify whether the availability of catheter laboratory affects clinical outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) complicating myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Patients admitted with a diagnosis of AMI and OHCA from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) between 2010 to 2017 were stratified into three groups based on initial hospital's catheter laboratory status: hospitals without a catheter laboratory (No-catheter lab hospitals), hospitals with diagnostic catheter laboratory (Diagnostic hospitals), and hospitals with PCI facilities (PCI hospitals). We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with clinical outcomes. Results: We included 12, 303 patients of which 9, 798 were admitted to PCI hospitals, 1, 595 to no-catheter lab hospitals, and 910 to diagnostic hospitals. Patients admitted to PCI hospitals were more frequently reviewed by a cardiologist (96%, p < 0.001) than no-catheter lab hospitals (80%) and diagnostic hospitals (74%), and more likely to receive coronary angiography (PCI hospitals (87%), diagnostic hospitals (31%), no-catheter lab hospitals (54%), p < 0.001). They also were more likely to undergo PCI (PCI hospitals (42%), diagnostic hospitals (17%), no-catheter lab hospitals (17%), p < 0.001). After adjustment, there was no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55–1.06) or re-infarction (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.72–2.26)Graphical abstract: Abstract: Objectives: We aimed to identify whether the availability of catheter laboratory affects clinical outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) complicating myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Patients admitted with a diagnosis of AMI and OHCA from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) between 2010 to 2017 were stratified into three groups based on initial hospital's catheter laboratory status: hospitals without a catheter laboratory (No-catheter lab hospitals), hospitals with diagnostic catheter laboratory (Diagnostic hospitals), and hospitals with PCI facilities (PCI hospitals). We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate factors associated with clinical outcomes. Results: We included 12, 303 patients of which 9, 798 were admitted to PCI hospitals, 1, 595 to no-catheter lab hospitals, and 910 to diagnostic hospitals. Patients admitted to PCI hospitals were more frequently reviewed by a cardiologist (96%, p < 0.001) than no-catheter lab hospitals (80%) and diagnostic hospitals (74%), and more likely to receive coronary angiography (PCI hospitals (87%), diagnostic hospitals (31%), no-catheter lab hospitals (54%), p < 0.001). They also were more likely to undergo PCI (PCI hospitals (42%), diagnostic hospitals (17%), no-catheter lab hospitals (17%), p < 0.001). After adjustment, there was no significant difference in the in-hospital mortality (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55–1.06) or re-infarction (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.72–2.26) in patients admitted to PCI hospitals nor in patients admitted to diagnostic hospitals (mortality (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.72–2.26), re-infarction (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.68–2.82)). Conclusion: There is variation in coronary angiography use between hospitals without a catheter laboratory and PCI centres, which was not associated with better in-hospital survival. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Resuscitation. Volume 170(2022)
- Journal:
- Resuscitation
- Issue:
- Volume 170(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 170, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 170
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0170-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- 327
- Page End:
- 334
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01
- Subjects:
- Resuscitation -- Periodicals
Resuscitation -- Periodicals
Réanimation -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.025 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03009572 ↗
http://www.resuscitationjournal.com/ ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03009572 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03009572 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.031 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0300-9572
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7785.420000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20661.xml