Effects of exogenous melatonin supplementation on health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses based on randomized controlled trials. (February 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effects of exogenous melatonin supplementation on health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses based on randomized controlled trials. (February 2022)
- Main Title:
- Effects of exogenous melatonin supplementation on health outcomes: An umbrella review of meta-analyses based on randomized controlled trials
- Authors:
- Lim, Soojin
Park, Seoyeon
Koyanagi, Ai
Yang, Jae Won
Jacob, Louis
Yon, Dong Keon
Lee, Seung Won
Kim, Min Seo
Il Shin, Jae
Smith, Lee - Abstract:
- Abstract: Various melatonin supplementations have been developed to improve health outcomes in various clinical conditions. Thus, we sought to evaluate and summarize the effect of melatonin treatments in clinical settings for health outcomes. We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to 4 February 2021. We included meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials investigating the melatonin intervention for any health outcome. Based on the different effect sizes of each meta-analysis, we calculated random models' standardized mean differences or risk ratios. We observed robust evidence supported by statistical significance with non-considerable heterogeneity between studies for sleep-related problems, cancer, surgical patients, and pregnant women. Patients with sleep disorder, sleep onset latency (SMD 0.33, 95% CI: 0.10 – 0.56, P < 0.01) were significantly improved whereas no clear evidence was shown with sleep efficiency (1.10, 95% CI: −0.26 to 2.45). The first analgesic requirement time (SMD 5.81, 95% CI: 2.57–9.05, P < 0.001) of surgical patients was distinctly improved. Female patients under artificial reproductive technologies had significant increase in the top-quality embryos (SMD 0.53, 95% CI: 0.27 – 0.79, P < 0.001), but no statistically clear evidence was found in the live birth rate (SMD 1.20, 95% CI: 0.83 – 1.72). Survival at one year (RR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.28 – 2.83, P < 0.005) significantly increased with cancer patients. Research onAbstract: Various melatonin supplementations have been developed to improve health outcomes in various clinical conditions. Thus, we sought to evaluate and summarize the effect of melatonin treatments in clinical settings for health outcomes. We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to 4 February 2021. We included meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials investigating the melatonin intervention for any health outcome. Based on the different effect sizes of each meta-analysis, we calculated random models' standardized mean differences or risk ratios. We observed robust evidence supported by statistical significance with non-considerable heterogeneity between studies for sleep-related problems, cancer, surgical patients, and pregnant women. Patients with sleep disorder, sleep onset latency (SMD 0.33, 95% CI: 0.10 – 0.56, P < 0.01) were significantly improved whereas no clear evidence was shown with sleep efficiency (1.10, 95% CI: −0.26 to 2.45). The first analgesic requirement time (SMD 5.81, 95% CI: 2.57–9.05, P < 0.001) of surgical patients was distinctly improved. Female patients under artificial reproductive technologies had significant increase in the top-quality embryos (SMD 0.53, 95% CI: 0.27 – 0.79, P < 0.001), but no statistically clear evidence was found in the live birth rate (SMD 1.20, 95% CI: 0.83 – 1.72). Survival at one year (RR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.28 – 2.83, P < 0.005) significantly increased with cancer patients. Research on melatonin interventions to treat clinical symptoms and sleep problems among diverse health conditions was identified and provided considerable evidence. Future well-designed randomized clinical trials of high quality and subgroup quantitative analyses are essential. Graphical Abstract: ga1 Highlights: Melatonin in Alzheimer improved the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Pregnancy rates on women with ART shown improvement with melatonin intervention. Perioperative patients' need for analgesics significantly reduced. Side effects of radiochemotherapy of cancer improved with melatonin. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Pharmacological research. Volume 176(2022)
- Journal:
- Pharmacological research
- Issue:
- Volume 176(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 176, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 176
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0176-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-02
- Subjects:
- Melatonin (PubChem CID:896) -- Inositol (PubChem CID:892) -- Clozapine (PubChem CID:135398737) -- Olanzapine (PubChem CID:135398745) -- Risperidone (PubChem CID:5073) -- Quetiapine (PubChem CID:5002) -- Midazolam (PubChem CID:4192) -- Oxazepam (PubChem CID:4616) -- Alprazolam (PubChem CID:2118)
Melatonin -- Umbrella review -- Randomized controlled trial -- Clinical outcome
Pharmacology -- Periodicals
Pharmacology -- Periodicals
Research -- Periodicals
Médicaments -- Recherche -- Périodiques
Pharmacologie -- Périodiques
615.105 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10436618 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.106052 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1043-6618
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6446.550000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20665.xml