Improving maternal and newborn health services in Northeast Nigeria through a government-led partnership of stakeholders: a quasi-experimental study. Issue 2 (1st February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Willey, Barbara; Umar, Nasir; Beaumont, Emma; Allen, Elizabeth; Anyanti, Jennifer; Bello, Abubakar Bala; Bhattacharya, Antoinette; Exley, Josephine; Makowiecka, Krystyna; Okolo, Magdalene; Sani, Rabi; Schellenberg, Joanna; Spicer, Neil; Usman, Umar Adamu; Gana, Ahmed Mohammed; Shuaibu, Abdulrahman; Marchant, Tanya
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 12:Issue 2(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-02-01
• Subjects: organisation of health services -- public health -- neonatology -- maternal medicine; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048877
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: This study aimed to quantify change in the coverage, quality and equity of essential maternal and newborn healthcare interventions in Gombe state, Northeast Nigeria, following a four year, government-led, maternal and newborn health intervention. Design: Quasi-experimental plausibility study. Repeat cross-sectional household and linked health facility surveys were implemented in intervention and comparison areas. Setting: Gombe state, Northeast Nigeria. Participants: Each household survey included a sample of 1000 women aged 13–49 years with a live birth in the previous 12 months. Health facility surveys comprised a readiness assessment and birth attendant interview. Interventions: Between 2016–2019 a complex package of evidence-based interventions was implemented to increase access, use and quality of maternal and newborn healthcare, spanning the six WHO health system building blocks. Outcome measures: Eighteen indicators of maternal and newborn healthcare. Results: Between 2016 and 2019, the coverage of all indicators improved in intervention areas, with the exception of postnatal and postpartum contacts, which remained below 15%. Greater improvements were observed in intervention than comparison areas for eight indicators, including coverage of at least one antenatal visit (71% (95% CI 62 to 68) to 88% (95% CI 82 to 93)), at least four antenatal visits (46% (95% CI 39 to 53) to 69% (95% CI 60 to 75)), facility birth (48% (95% CI 37 to 59) to 64% (95% CI 54 to 73)), administration of uterotonics (44% (95% CI 34 to 54) to 59% (95% CI 50 to 67)), delayed newborn bathing (44% (95% CI 36 to 52) to 62% (95% CI 52 to 71)) and clean cord care (42% (95% CI 34 to 49) to 73% (95% CI 66 to 79)). Wide-spread inequities persisted however; only at least one antenatal visit saw pro-poor improvement. Conclusions: This intervention achieved improvements in life-saving behaviours for mothers and newborns, demonstrating that multipartner action, coordinated through government leadership, can shift the needle in the right direction, even in resource-constrained settings.