Cesium transfer to millet and mustard as a function of Cs availability in soils. (March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Flouret, A.; Henner, P.; Coppin, F.; Pierrisnard, S.; Carasco, L.; Février, L.
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental radioactivity. Volume 243(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-03
• Subjects: Concentration ratio -- Soil/plant transfer -- Phylogeny -- Bioavailability -- Rhizotest; Radioactivity -- Periodicals; Radiation, Background -- Periodicals; Radioecology -- Periodicals; Radioactive pollution -- Periodicals; Environmental Pollutants -- Periodicals; Radioactive Pollutants -- Periodicals; Radioactivity -- Periodicals; Radioécologie -- Périodiques; Pollution radioactive -- Périodiques; Fond de rayonnement -- Périodiques; 539.752
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106800
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0265-931X

Abstract

Abstract: 137 Cs is one of the most persistent radioactive contaminants in soil after a nuclear accident. It can be taken up by plants and enter the human food chain generating a potential human health hazard. Although a large amount of literature has highlighted the role of the different processes involved in Cs uptake by plants, there is still no simple way to predict its transfer for a specific plant from a particular soil. Based on the assumption that the concentration ratio (CR) of Cs can be predicted from one plant taxon if the CR of another taxon is known and taken as reference, whatever the supporting soils, a series of plant/soil Cs transfer experiments were performed on Rhizotest during 21 days using three soils with different textures, clay and organic matter contents and two plants (millet and mustard) with potentially contrasting Cs uptake capacity based on their phylogeny. CRs of each plant varied by 2–3 orders of magnitude depending on the soil and contrary to expectations, the CRs of mustard were either higher (for clay soil), equal (for clay-loam soil) or lower (for sandy soil) than the one of millet. Considering Cs availability in soils and defining a new CR based on the amount of Cs available in the soil (CRavail ) decreased the range of variation in CR between the different soil types for a given plant by one order of magnitude. Differences in Cs (and K) translocation to shoots, possibly specific to millet within Poales, could partly explain the relative CRs of millet and mustard as a function of soils. Highlights: Soil/plant Cs transfer experiments on Rhizotests with three soils and two plants. The Cs CR of mustard is not always the highest, contrary to plant phylogeny predictions. Differences in CRs may partly relate to the translocation capacities of millet. Calculating CR based on the available Cs pool in soils reduce the range of CR variation.