Analysis by real‐time PCR of five transport and conservation mediums of nasopharyngeal swab samples to COVID‐19 diagnosis in Santiago of Chile. Issue 3 (15th November 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Analysis by real‐time PCR of five transport and conservation mediums of nasopharyngeal swab samples to COVID‐19 diagnosis in Santiago of Chile. Issue 3 (15th November 2021)
- Main Title:
- Analysis by real‐time PCR of five transport and conservation mediums of nasopharyngeal swab samples to COVID‐19 diagnosis in Santiago of Chile
- Authors:
- Barrera‐Avalos, Carlos
Luraschi, Roberto
Vallejos‐Vidal, Eva
Figueroa, Maximiliano
Arenillas, Esteban
Barría, Daniela
Hernández, Felipe
Mateluna, Carlos
Mena, Javier
Rioseco, Claudia
Torrent, Claudia
Vergara, Claudio
Gutiérrez, Gaby
Quiroz, Javiera
Alarcón, Javiera
Cartagena, Julio
Cayunao, Javiera
Mella‐Torres, Andrea
Santibañez, Álvaro
Tapia, Sebastián
Undurraga, Alejandro
Vargas, Deborah
Wong, Valentina
Inostroza‐Molina, Ailen
Valdés, Daniel
Imarai, Mónica
Acuña‐Castillo, Claudio
Reyes‐López, Felipe E.
Sandino, Ana M. - Other Names:
- Luo Guangxiang (George) guestEditor.
Ly Hinh guestEditor.
Gao Shou‐Jiang guestEditor. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, many transport kits have been manufactured to preserve and transport nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPSs) from patients. However, there is no information on the performance of the different virus transport media (VTM) used in COVID‐19 diagnosis in the population of Santiago de Chile. We compared the RT‐qPCR amplification profile of five different viral transport kit mediums, including DNA/RNA Shield™, NAT, VTM‐N, Ezmedlab™, and phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS), for NPSs from Central Metropolitan Health Service, Santiago, Chile. The DNA/RNA Shield™ medium showed a better performance in terms of Cq and RFU values for the internal reference RNase P and viral ORF1ab probes. By contrast, the PBS transport medium registered higher Cq values for the viral and reference gene, compared to the other VTM. DNA/RNA Shield™ shows higher relative fluorescence units (RFUs) and lower Cq values for the reference gene. Collectively, our results suggest that the PBS medium could compromise the sample diagnosis because of its lower RT‐qPCR performance. The NAT, Ezmedlab and VTM‐N, and DNA/RNA Shield™ media show acceptable RT‐qPCR parameters and, consequently, seem suitable for use in COVID‐19 diagnosis.
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of medical virology. Volume 94:Issue 3(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of medical virology
- Issue:
- Volume 94:Issue 3(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 94, Issue 3 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 94
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0094-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 1167
- Page End:
- 1174
- Publication Date:
- 2021-11-15
- Subjects:
- false negative diagnostic -- nasopharyngeal sample transport kits -- RNA subunit of ribonuclease P (RNase P) amplification -- SARS‐CoV‐2 diagnostics -- SARS‐CoV‐2 ORF1ab gene -- virus transport medium
Virology -- Periodicals
616 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9071 ↗
http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0146-6615 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jmv.27446 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0146-6615
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5017.095000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20642.xml