Bringing a health systems modelling approach to complex evaluations: multicountry applications in HIV, TB and malaria. Issue 11 (3rd November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Phillips, David E; Ambrosio, Guillermo; Batzel, Audrey; Cerezo, Carmen; Duber, Herbert; Faye, Adama; Gaye, Ibrahima; Hernández Prado, Bernardo; Huntley, Bethany; Kestler, Edgar; Kingongo, Constant; Lim, Stephen S; Linebarger, Emily; Matute, Jorge; Mpanya, Godefroid; Mulongo, Salva; O'Brien-Carelli, Caitlin; Palmisano, Erin; Rios Casas, Francisco; Shelley, Katharine; Tine, Roger; Whitaker, Daniel; Ross, Jennifer M
• Is Part Of: BMJ global health. Volume 5:Issue 11(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-11-03
• Subjects: health systems evaluation -- HIV -- tuberculosis -- malaria -- mathematical modelling; World health -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002441
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2059-7908

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Understanding how to deliver interventions more effectively is a growing emphasis in Global Health. Simultaneously, health system strengthening is a key component to improving delivery. As a result, it is challenging to evaluate programme implementation while reflecting real-world complexity. We present our experience in using a health systems modelling approach as part of a mixed-methods evaluation and describe applications of these models. Methods: We developed a framework for how health systems translate financial inputs into health outcomes, with in-country and international experts. We collated available data to measure framework indicators and developed models for malaria in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and tuberculosis in Guatemala and Senegal using Bayesian structural equation modelling. We conducted several postmodelling analyses: measuring efficiency, assessing bottlenecks, understanding mediation, analysing the cascade of care and measuring subnational effectiveness. Results: The DRC model indicated a strong relationship between shipment of commodities and utilisation thereof. In Guatemala, the strongest model coefficients were more evenly distributed. Results in Senegal varied most, but pathways related to community care had the strongest relationships. In DRC, we used model results to estimate the end-to-end cost of delivering commodities. In Guatemala, we used model results to identify potential bottlenecks and understand mediation. In Senegal, we used model results to identify potential weak links in the cascade of care, and explore subnationally. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a complementary modelling approach to traditional evaluation methods. Although these models have limitations, they can be applied in a variety of ways to gain greater insight into implementation and functioning of health service delivery.