Preoperative halo-gravity traction with and without thoracoscopic anterior release for skeletal dysplasia patients with severe kyphoscoliosis. (April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pourtaheri, Sina; Shah, Suken A.; Ditro, Colleen P.; Holmes, Laurens; Mackenzie, William G.
• Is Part Of: Journal of children's orthopaedics. Volume 10:Number 2(2016)
• Page Start: 135
• Page End: 142
• Publication Date: 2016-04
• Subjects: Skeletal dysplasia -- Kyphoscoliosis -- Halo-gravity traction -- Scoliosis; Pediatric orthopedics -- Periodicals; 618.927005
• DOI: 10.1007/s11832-016-0721-0
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1863-2521

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Recent work has shown the safety and efficacy of halo-gravity traction as an operative adjunct. However, there are no reports specifically looking at halo-gravity traction in patients with skeletal dysplasia. Our purpose was to assess the safety and efficacy of traction in children with skeletal dysplasia who present with severe kyphoscoliosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed eight consecutive children with skeletal dysplasia who were treated with halo-gravity traction preoperatively. Six of the patients had a thoracoscopic anterior release prior to the halo-gravity traction. All patients were ambulatory and presented with severe, rigid kyphoscoliosis. Results: The mean duration of traction was 32 days. There were no neurologic complications with traction or after posterior spinal instrumentation. The majority of kyphoscoliosis correction was with the halo-gravity traction alone: major curve (MC) Cobb angle improved 41 %; C7–center sacral vertical line, 75 %; C7–MC apex, 21 %; and T2–T12 kyphosis, 35 %. Trunk height increased 37 % and thoracic height 44 %. An additional amount of correction was obtained with posterior spinal instrumentation (±fusion), decreasing MC Cobb angle an additional 23 %; C7–apex, 16 %; and T2–T12 kyphosis, 10 %. There was no additional correction of thoracic height. Two years after posterior spinal instrumentation (±fusion), a mild-to-moderate amount of correction was lost: MC Cobb angle decreased 23 %; compensatory Cobb angle, 28 %; C7–CSVL, 24 %; C7–S1, 22 %; regional kyphosis, 31 %; thoracic kyphosis, 29 %; and trunk height, 27 %. Conclusions: Among children with skeletal dysplasia and severe kyphosis, halo-gravity traction is well tolerated and safe. Most of the corrections in radiographic parameters were achieved with traction alone. Traction improves coronal balance, apical translation, thoracic height, and kyphosis. In this specific population, the potential for neurologic injury during corrective surgery is high. However, preoperative halo-gravity traction provides slow, progressive correction in a safe manner and avoided neurologic injury in these patients. This study did not compare patients without halo-gravity traction to patients with halo-gravity traction, therefore it cannot be concluded that going straight to instrumentation without traction will give a poorer radiographic result. Level of evidence: IV.