The Accessory Parotid Gland and its Clinical Significance. Issue 3 (May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rosa, Mateusz A.; Łazarz, Dominik P.; Pękala, Jakub R.; Skinningsrud, Bendik; Lauritzen, Sigurd S.; Solewski, Bernard; Pękala, Przemysław A.; Walocha, Jerzy A.; Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of craniofacial surgery. Volume 31:Issue 3(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-05
• Subjects: Accessory parotid gland -- malignancies -- mid-cheek mass -- parotidectomy -- sialadenitis; Facial bones -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Skull -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.52
• DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006092
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-2275

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The accessory parotid gland is a collection of salivary tissue separate from the main parotid gland. When present, it may complicate parotidectomies, promote parotitis, and serve as a potential site for benign and malignant lesions to arise. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive and current overview of the anatomy of the accessory parotid gland, as there is a wide discrepancy in the literature regarding its prevalence. Materials and Methods: The authors conducted a search in PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, SciELO, BIOSIS, Current Content Connect, Korean Journal Database, and Russian Citation Index to identify all studies which reported relevant data on the accessory, with no date or language restrictions applied. Data on prevalence, side of occurrence, and sex dimorphism of the accessory parotid gland were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis. Results: A total of 13 articles (n = 3115 subjects) were included in the study. The results revealed that the overall pooled prevalence of an accessory parotid gland was 32.1% (95% confidence interval: 21.2–44.0). It was more prevalent in cadaveric studies (35.8%) than in computed tomography studies (21.5%), had a higher prevalence in Asia (33.8%) as compared to North America (23.5%), and when present, it was most often found as an unilateral structure (77.8%). Conclusions: With respect to the findings presented, the accessory parotid gland may be considered an anatomical variation likely to encounter in the population. More anatomical studies on the structure and its prevalence are needed, in all regions of the world, to provide a representative global overview. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text