Headscarves and the CJEU: Protecting fundamental rights and pandering to prejudice, the CJEU does both. Issue 2 (April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Howard, Erica
• Is Part Of: Maastricht journal of European and comparative law. Volume 29:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 245
• Page End: 262
• Publication Date: 2022-04
• Subjects: Islamic headscarves -- employment -- religion or belief discrimination -- direct and indirect discrimination -- justification; Law -- European Union countries -- Periodicals; Comparative law -- Periodicals; 341.2422
• DOI: 10.1177/1023263X221080557
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1023-263X

Abstract

The CJEU judgment in the two latest Islamic headscarf cases was handed down in July 2021. The judgment allows employers to ban the wearing of religious and other symbols by employees, but it does specify under what conditions this can be done. This article builds on a previous article on the opinion of AG Rantos and the Shadow Opinion of former AG Sharpston and analyses the judgment in detail. It argues that the judgment is an improvement on the previous CJEU headscarf judgments in that it provides more protection for fundamental human rights. However, the CJEU also appears to allow employers to a certain extent to pander to the prejudicial wishes of their customers. The article concludes that the judgment presents a small glimmer of hope that the CJEU might be moving – albeit very slowly - towards more protection of Muslim women who want to wear headscarves at work for religious reasons.