Managing the Cascading Risks of Droughts: Institutional Adaptation in Transboundary River Basins. Issue 6 (15th June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Garrick, Dustin E.; Schlager, Edella; De Stefano, Lucia; Villamayor‐Tomas, Sergio
• Is Part Of: Earth's future. Volume 6:Issue 6(2018)
• Page Start: 809
• Page End: 827
• Publication Date: 2018-06-15
• Subjects: drought -- risk -- adaptation -- institutional analysis -- Rio Grande -- spillovers; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences; Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1002/2018EF000823
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2328-4277

Abstract

Abstract: Transboundary river basins experience complex coordination challenges during droughts. The multiscale nature of drought creates potential for spillovers when upstream adaptation decisions have cascading impacts on downstream regions. This paper advances the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework to examine drought adaptation decision‐making in a multijurisdictional context. We integrate concepts of risk management into the IAD framework to characterize drought across its natural and human dimensions. A global analysis identifies regions where severe droughts combine with institutional fragmentation to require coordinated adaptation. We apply the risk‐based IAD framework to examine drought adaptation in the Rio Bravo/Grande—an archetypical transboundary river shared by the United States and Mexico and by multiple states within each country. The analysis draws on primary data and a questionnaire with 50 water managers in four distinct, yet interlinked, "institutional catchments, " which vary in terms of their drought characteristics, socioeconomic attributes, and governance arrangements. The results highlight the heterogeneity of droughts and uneven distribution of their impacts due to the interplay of drought hazards and institutional fragmentation. Transboundary water sharing agreements influence the types and sequence of interactions between upstream and downstream jurisdictions, which we describe as spillovers that involve both conflict and cooperation. Interdependent jurisdictions often draw on informal decision‐making venues (e.g., data sharing, operational decisions) due to the higher transaction costs and uncertainty associated with courts and planning processes, yet existing coordination and conflict resolution venues have proven insufficient for severe, sustained droughts. Observatories will be needed to measure and manage the cascading risks of drought. Key Points: Transboundary water institutions influence the propagation of drought risks and vulnerability to them Upstream adaptation decisions create spillovers for downstream jurisdictions that can spur conflict resolution and cooperation Informal decision‐making venues can prevent spillovers from cascading but may be insufficient to resolve conflicts associated with severe droughts