Employee wellness on the frontline: an interactional psychology perspective. (6th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Solnet, David; Subramony, Mahesh; Golubovskaya, Maria; Snyder, Hannah; Gray, Whitney; Liberman, Olga; Verma, Rohit
• Is Part Of: Journal of service management. Volume 31:Number 5(2020)
• Page Start: 939
• Page End: 952
• Publication Date: 2020-05-06
• Subjects: Wellness -- Workplace Wellness Programs (WWP) -- Interactional psychology -- Frontline service workers (FLSW) -- Employee Agency; Service industries -- Management -- Periodicals; 658.005
• DOI: 10.1108/JOSM-12-2019-0377
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1757-5818

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Employee wellness is vital to creating high-quality employee–customer interactions, yet frontline service workers (FLSWs) do not typically engage in, or benefit from, wellness initiatives. This paper aims to conceptually model the interactive influences of organizational and employee factors in influencing FLSW involvement in wellness programs and provides suggestions on how service organizations can enhance wellness behaviors and outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: This paper builds upon classical and contemporary management theories to identify important gaps in knowledge about how employees and firms engage with wellness. Interactive psychology, emphasizing multidirectional interaction between person (employee) and situation (organization) wellness orientation, is introduced. Findings: The paper develops a model that can be used to assess organizational wellness program effectiveness by emphasizing the interaction of employee and organizational wellness orientation. The model illustrates that wellness effectiveness relies equally on employee agency through an active wellness orientation matched with the organizational wellness orientation. Originality/value: This paper questions the dominant approaches to assessing the effectiveness of workplace wellness initiatives, arguing for a more humanistic and agentic perspective rather than traditional organizationally centered fiscal measures.