Fatal outcomes following immunization errors as reported to the EudraVigilance: A case series. Issue 15 (30th March 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Fatal outcomes following immunization errors as reported to the EudraVigilance: A case series. Issue 15 (30th March 2020)
- Main Title:
- Fatal outcomes following immunization errors as reported to the EudraVigilance: A case series
- Authors:
- Hoeve, Christina E.
Gadroen, Kartini
Kwa, Marcel S.G.
van Haren, Anja
Sturkenboom, Miriam C.J.M.
Straus, Sabine M.J.M. - Abstract:
- Highlights: The continuing need for quality control during administration of multi-dose vaccines. The importance of screening of patients for immunocompromising factors when a live-attenuated vaccine is used. The need for education on the importance of adherence to vaccination schedules. The importance of measures to improve visually distinguishing features on vaccines and medicines. Abstract: Background: Serious adverse reactions after immunization are rare but do occur. In very rare instances, cases with fatal outcome have been reported. These reports can have a huge impact and even more so when due to an immunization error. The aim of this study is to systematically review immunization errors with fatal outcomes in EudraVigilance. Methods: This was a case-series analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) reporting immunization errors and a fatal outcome. To determine the level of certainty of a causal association between the immunization errors and fatal outcomes two independent reviewers assessed all ICSRs using the WHO tool "Causality assessment of an Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI)". In accordance with the tool, the ICSRs were classified as consistent, indeterminate, inconsistent/coincidental, or unclassifiable. In addition, we estimated the contribution of reported errors to the fatal outcomes as large, moderate, small, none, or unclassifiable using a classification developed for this study. Results: A total of 154 ICSRs met the inclusion criteria.Highlights: The continuing need for quality control during administration of multi-dose vaccines. The importance of screening of patients for immunocompromising factors when a live-attenuated vaccine is used. The need for education on the importance of adherence to vaccination schedules. The importance of measures to improve visually distinguishing features on vaccines and medicines. Abstract: Background: Serious adverse reactions after immunization are rare but do occur. In very rare instances, cases with fatal outcome have been reported. These reports can have a huge impact and even more so when due to an immunization error. The aim of this study is to systematically review immunization errors with fatal outcomes in EudraVigilance. Methods: This was a case-series analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) reporting immunization errors and a fatal outcome. To determine the level of certainty of a causal association between the immunization errors and fatal outcomes two independent reviewers assessed all ICSRs using the WHO tool "Causality assessment of an Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI)". In accordance with the tool, the ICSRs were classified as consistent, indeterminate, inconsistent/coincidental, or unclassifiable. In addition, we estimated the contribution of reported errors to the fatal outcomes as large, moderate, small, none, or unclassifiable using a classification developed for this study. Results: A total of 154 ICSRs met the inclusion criteria. Vaccines reported most frequently were pneumococcal (33), rabies (27) and influenza vaccines (24). Most frequently reported errors were non-compliance with recommended schedules of immunization (63). The most frequently reported vaccine-error combination was rabies vaccines and non-compliance with a recommended schedule of immunization (23). Twelve cases were classified as consistent with causal association and had a large error contribution. These cases concerned a cluster of six cases reporting incorrect handling of multi-dose vials containing measles vaccine and six cases reporting administration of live-attenuated vaccines to immunocompromised patients. Discussion: In this study, we showed that fatal outcomes following immunization errors are very rare. Four key issues were the importance of: (1) quality control of multi-dose vaccines, (2) screening patients for immunocompromising factors, (3) education on the importance of adherence, and (4) measures to improve distinction between vaccines and medicines. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Vaccine. Volume 38:Issue 15(2020)
- Journal:
- Vaccine
- Issue:
- Volume 38:Issue 15(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 38, Issue 15 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 38
- Issue:
- 15
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0038-0015-0000
- Page Start:
- 3086
- Page End:
- 3095
- Publication Date:
- 2020-03-30
- Subjects:
- Immunization errors -- Causality assessment -- Spontaneous reporting -- Fatalities -- Pharmacovigilance
Vaccines -- Periodicals
615.372 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0264410X ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/0264410X ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0264410X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.02.074 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0264-410X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9138.628000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20550.xml