Sustainable feedstock for bioethanol production: Impact of spatial resolution on the design of a sustainable biomass supply-chain. (April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sharara, Mahmoud A.; Sahoo, Kamalakanta; Reddy, Ashwan Daram; Kim, Seungdo; Zhang, Xuesong; Dale, Bruce; Jones, Curtis Dinneen; Izaurralde, Roberto Cesar; Runge, Troy M.
• Is Part Of: Bioresource technology. Volume 302(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-04
• Subjects: Optimization -- Biofuel -- Life cycle assessment -- Spatial analysis -- Environmental impacts; Biomass -- Periodicals; Biomass energy -- Periodicals; Bioremediation -- Periodicals; Agricultural wastes -- Periodicals; Factory and trade waste -- Periodicals; Organic wastes -- Periodicals; Bioénergie -- Périodiques; Déchets agricoles -- Périodiques; Déchets industriels -- Périodiques; Déchets organiques -- Périodiques; Déchets (Combustible) -- Périodiques; 662.88
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122896
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-8524

Abstract

Highlights: Spatial resolution and variations affect environmental assessment and decision-making. Aggregation of geospatial data showed little influences on GWP. Aggregation of geospatial data showed significant influences on eutrophication and soil loss. Selective harvesting at higher resolution can significantly lower environmental impacts. Harvesting 50% of the total available stover incurred only 15–24% of the total soil erosion. Abstract: This study assesses the role of spatial-resolution and spatial-variations in environmental impacts estimation and decision-making for corn-stover harvesting to produce biofuels. Geospatial corn-stover yields and environmental impacts [global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication, and soil-loss] dataset for two study areas in Wisconsin and Michigan were generated through Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) model and aggregated at different spatial-resolutions (i.e., 100; 1000; 10, 000 ha). For each spatial-resolution, decision-making was accomplished using an optimization routine to minimize different environmental impacts associated with harvesting stover to meet varied biomass demands. The results of the study showed that selective harvesting at higher-resolution (or lower-aggregation level) can result in significantly lower environmental impacts, especially at low stover demand levels. Additionally, the increased spatial resolution had more impact in minimizing the environmental impacts of corn stover harvest under a more variable landscape such as terrains and its influences are more pronounced for soil-loss and eutrophication potential compared to GWP.