Evaluation of the Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center Hospital‐in‐Home Program. Issue 7 (20th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cai, Shubing; Grubbs, Andrew; Makineni, Rajesh; Kinosian, Bruce; Phibbs, Ciaran S.; Intrator, Orna
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Volume 66:Issue 7(2018)
• Page Start: 1392
• Page End: 1398
• Publication Date: 2018-04-20
• Subjects: Hospital‐in‐Home -- veterans -- evaluation; Geriatrics -- Periodicals; 618.97
• DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15382
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-8614

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To examine hospital readmissions, costs, mortality, and nursing home admissions of veterans who received Hospital‐in‐Home (HIH) services. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). Participants: Study cohort included veterans who received HIH services as an alternative to inpatient care between October 1, 2012, and November 30, 2015, and non‐HIH veterans who were hospitalized for similar conditions in the Cincinnati VAMC during the same period. We identified 138 veterans who used HIH services and 694 non‐HIH veterans. Intervention: HIH veterans received hospital‐equivalent care at home. Non‐HIH veterans received traditional inpatient services in the Cincinnati VAMC. Measurements: Total costs of care for treating an acute episode (HIH services vs inpatient) and likelihood of hospital readmission, death, or nursing home admission within 30 days of discharge from HIH services or hospitalization. Results: Average per person costs were $7, 792 for HIH services and $10, 960 for traditional inpatient care (P<0.001). HIH veterans were less likely to use a nursing home within 30 days of discharge (3.1%) than non‐HIH veterans (12.6%) (P<0.001). Thirty‐day readmission rates and mortality were not statistically different between HIH and non‐HIH veterans. Conclusion: The substitutive HIH model implemented in the Cincinnati VAMC delivered acute services in veterans' homes at lower cost and with lower likelihood of postdischarge nursing home use. Broader implementation of this innovative delivery model may benefit older adults in need of care while reducing healthcare system costs.