Association of teleworking and smoking behavior of U.S. wage and salary workers. Issue 1 (2nd October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nargis, Nigar; Li, Qing; Griffin, Lauren; Asare, Samuel; Bandi, Priti; Majmundar, Anuja; Westmaas, J Lee; Jemal, Ahmedin
• Is Part Of: Journal of occupational health. Volume 63:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-10-02
• Subjects: COVID‐19 pandemic -- smoking intensity -- smoking prevalence -- telecommuting; Medicine, Industrial -- Periodicals; Industrial hygiene -- Periodicals; Medicine, Industrial; Occupational Diseases; Occupational Exposure; Occupational Health; Occupational Medicine; Periodicals; Periodical; Electronic journals; 613.62
• DOI: 10.1002/1348-9585.12283
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1341-9145

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The COVID‐19 pandemic has led to a major shift in workspace from office to home. This report examined how telecommuting is related to smoking behavior of wage and salary workers. Methods: Self‐reported smoking behavior of 1, 390 U.S. wage and salary workers aged 16–64 years from the Tobacco Use Supplement of the Current Population Survey 2018/19 were linked to the 2018 American Time Use Survey. Weighted multivariate logistic regression predicting smoking probability and generalized linear regression predicting smoking intensity were used for analysis. Results: Almost a fifth (19%) of wage and salary workers reported working from home and over a half (52%) reported working in telecommuting amenable occupations. Nearly 12% were current smokers, smoking 14.7 cigarettes daily on average. Compared to their counterparts, smoking prevalence (percentage points) was lower among those employed in telecommuting amenable occupations (−0.52, p < .001 for all; 0.01, p = .862 for men; −2.40, p < .001 for women) and who worked more frequently from home (−0.21, p < .001 for all; −0.76, p < .001 for men; −0.03, p = .045 for women). Smoking intensity (cigarettes per day) was lower among those employed in telecommuting amenable occupations (−3.39, p = .03 for all; −0.36, p = .90 for men; −4.30, p = .21 for women). We found no statistically significant association between smoking intensity and telecommuting frequency. Conclusions: The lower likelihood of smoking and lower level of smoking intensity among telecommuting wage and salary workers suggests the need for proactive efforts to address the potential exacerbation in occupation‐related smoking disparities between occupations that are and are not amenable to telecommuting.