The pig as a model system for investigating the recruitment and contribution of myofibroblasts in skin healing. Issue 1 (6th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hamilton, Douglas W.; Walker, John T.; Tinney, Dylan; Grynyshyn, Michael; El‐Warrak, Alexander; Truscott, Emily; Flynn, Lauren E.
• Is Part Of: Wound repair and regeneration. Volume 30:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 45
• Page End: 63
• Publication Date: 2021-11-06
• Subjects: fibrogenic -- granulation tissue -- human skin -- myofibroblast precursors -- porcine skin healing; Wound healing -- Periodicals; Regeneration (Biology) -- Periodicals; 617.14
• DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12981
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-1927

Abstract

Abstract: In the skin‐healing field, porcine models are regarded as a useful analogue for human skin due to their numerous anatomical and physiological similarities. Despite the widespread use of porcine models in skin healing studies, the initial origin, recruitment and transition of fibroblasts to matrix‐secreting contractile myofibroblasts are not well defined for this model. In this review, we discuss the merit of the pig as an animal for studying myofibroblast origin, as well as the challenges associated with assessing their contributions to skin healing. Although a variety of wound types (incisional, partial thickness, full thickness, burns) have been investigated in pigs in attempts to mimic diverse injuries in humans, direct comparison of human healing profiles with regards to myofibroblasts shows evident differences. Following injury in porcine models, which often employ juvenile animals, myofibroblasts are described in the developing granulation tissue at 4 days, peaking at Days 7–14, and persisting at 60 days post‐wounding, although variations are evident depending on the specific pig breed. In human wounds, the presence of myofibroblasts is variable and does not correlate with the age of the wound or clinical contraction. Our comparison of porcine myofibroblast‐mediated healing processes with those in humans suggests that further validation of the pig model is essential. Moreover, we identify several limitations evident in experimental design that need to be better controlled, and standardisation of methodologies would be beneficial for the comparison and interpretation of results. In particular, we discuss anatomical location of the wounds, their size and depth, as well as the healing microenvironment (wet vs. moist vs. dry) in pigs and how this could influence myofibroblast recruitment. In summary, although a widespread model used in the skin healing field, further research is required to validate pigs as a useful analogue for human healing with regards to myofibroblasts.