A Guide to Performance Evaluation for the Intensivist: Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation and Focused Professional Practice Evaluation in the ICU. Issue 10 (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sterling, Michael; Gregg, Sara; Bakshi, Vishal; Moll, Vanessa
• Is Part Of: Critical care medicine. Volume 48:Issue 10(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: critical care medicine -- Focused Professional Practice Evaluation -- healthcare quality -- Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation -- safety -- The Joint Commission; Critical care medicine -- Periodicals; Soins intensifs -- Périodiques; 616.028
• DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004441
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0090-3493

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: In 2008, The Joint Commission implemented a new standard mandating a detailed evaluation of a provider's performance. The Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation was designed to provide ongoing performance evaluation as opposed to periodic evaluation. The Focused Professional Practice Evaluation was designed to evaluate the performance of providers new to the medical staff or providers who are requesting new privileges. To date, we are unable to find critical care specific literature on the implementation of Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation/Focused Professional Practice Evaluation. The purpose of this concise definitive review is to familiarize the reader with The Joint Commission standards and their application to Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation/Focused Professional Practice Evaluation design and implementation, literature review in the noncritical care setting, and future process optimization and automation. Data Sources: Studies were identified through MEDLINE search using a variety of search phrases related to Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation, Focused Professional Practice Evaluation, critical care medicine, healthcare quality, and The Joint Commission. Additional articles were identified through a review of the reference lists of identified articles. Study Selection: Original articles, review articles, and systematic reviews were considered. Data Extraction: Manuscripts were selected for inclusion based on expert opinion of well-designed or key studies and review articles. Data Synthesis: There is limited data for the process of Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation and Focused Professional Practice Evaluation implementation in critical care medicine. Key recommendations exist from The Joint Commission but leave it up to healthcare institutions to realize these. The process and metrics can be tailored to specific institutions and departments. Conclusions: Currently, there is no standard process to develop Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation and Focused Professional Practice Evaluation processes in critical care medicine. Departments and institutions can tailor metrics and processes but it might be useful to standardize some metrics to assure the overall quality of care. In the future utilization of newer technologies like applications might make this process less time-intensive.