Postoperative Infections in Dermatologic Surgery: The Role of Wound Cultures. Issue 10 (October 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Postoperative Infections in Dermatologic Surgery: The Role of Wound Cultures. Issue 10 (October 2020)
- Main Title:
- Postoperative Infections in Dermatologic Surgery
- Authors:
- Ken, Kimberly M.
Johnson, Mariah M.
Leitenberger, Justin J.
Neal, Donald E.
Etzkorn, Jeremy R.
Govas, Panayiota
Carroll, Bryan T.
Badawi, Ahmed H.
Mudigonda, Tejaswi
Council, M. Laurin
Avila, Christina
Carr, David R.
Sasaki, Jodie
Blalock, Travis W.
Golda, Nicholas J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : BACKGROUND: Dermatologic surgery is associated with low postoperative infection rates, averaging from approximately 1% to 4.25%. Often, postoperative infections are treated empirically based on clinical diagnosis of infection, given it can take 48 to 72 hours for a wound culture to identify a pathogen. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of empiric antibiotics in dermatologic surgery postoperative infections and if wound cultures change postoperative antibiotic therapy. METHODS: A 7-center, retrospective analysis of postoperative infections, with culture data, in dermatologic surgery patients was performed. RESULTS: Of 91 cases of clinically diagnosed postoperative infection, 82.4% ( n = 75) were successfully treated with empiric oral antibiotics (95% confidence interval [0.73–0.89], p < .0001). In 16 (17.6%) cases, initial empiric antibiotics were unsuccessful, and wound culture results altered antibiotic therapy in 9 cases (9.9%) with 6 (6.6%) of these cases requiring additional coverage for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). CONCLUSION: Empiric antibiotic treatment is usually appropriate for patients with postoperative surgical-site infections with wound cultures altering antibiotic management in a minority of cases. When empiric antibiotics fail, lack of MRSA coverage is usually the cause; therefore, providers should be aware of local MRSA prevalence and susceptibilities. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in theAbstract : BACKGROUND: Dermatologic surgery is associated with low postoperative infection rates, averaging from approximately 1% to 4.25%. Often, postoperative infections are treated empirically based on clinical diagnosis of infection, given it can take 48 to 72 hours for a wound culture to identify a pathogen. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of empiric antibiotics in dermatologic surgery postoperative infections and if wound cultures change postoperative antibiotic therapy. METHODS: A 7-center, retrospective analysis of postoperative infections, with culture data, in dermatologic surgery patients was performed. RESULTS: Of 91 cases of clinically diagnosed postoperative infection, 82.4% ( n = 75) were successfully treated with empiric oral antibiotics (95% confidence interval [0.73–0.89], p < .0001). In 16 (17.6%) cases, initial empiric antibiotics were unsuccessful, and wound culture results altered antibiotic therapy in 9 cases (9.9%) with 6 (6.6%) of these cases requiring additional coverage for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). CONCLUSION: Empiric antibiotic treatment is usually appropriate for patients with postoperative surgical-site infections with wound cultures altering antibiotic management in a minority of cases. When empiric antibiotics fail, lack of MRSA coverage is usually the cause; therefore, providers should be aware of local MRSA prevalence and susceptibilities. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Dermatologic surgery. Volume 46:Issue 10(2020)
- Journal:
- Dermatologic surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 46:Issue 10(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 46, Issue 10 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 46
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0046-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-10
- Subjects:
- Skin -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Skin -- Diseases -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.477 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002317 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1076-0512
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3555.140000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 20532.xml