When Does Vapor Pressure Deficit Drive or Reduce Evapotranspiration?. (28th October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Massmann, Adam; Gentine, Pierre; Lin, Changjie
• Is Part Of: Journal of advances in modeling earth systems. Volume 11:Number 10(2019)
• Page Start: 3305
• Page End: 3320
• Publication Date: 2019-10-28
• Subjects: evapotranspiration -- vapor pressure deficit -- ecohydrology -- stomatal conductance -- ecosystem modeling -- land‐atmosphere interaction; Geological modeling -- Periodicals; Climatology -- Periodicals; Geochemical modeling -- Periodicals; 551.5011
• DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001790
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1942-2466

Abstract

Abstract: Increasing vapor pressure deficit (VPD) increases atmospheric demand for water. While increased evapotranspiration (ET) in response to increased atmospheric demand seems intuitive, plants are capable of reducing ET in response to increased VPD by closing their stomata. We examine which effect dominates the response to increasing VPD: atmospheric demand and increases in ET or plant response (stomata closure) and decreases in ET. We use Penman‐Monteith, combined with semiempirical optimal stomatal regulation theory and underlying water use efficiency, to develop a theoretical framework for assessing ET response to VPD. The theory suggests that depending on the environment and plant characteristics, ET response to increasing VPD can vary from strongly decreasing to increasing, highlighting the diversity of plant water regulation strategies. The ET response varies due to (1) climate, with tropical and temperate climates more likely to exhibit a positive ET response to increasing VPD than boreal and arctic climates; (2) photosynthesis strategy, with C3 plants more likely to exhibit a positive ET response than C4 plants; and (3) plant type, with crops more likely to exhibit a positive ET response, and shrubs and gymniosperm trees more likely to exhibit a negative ET response. These results, derived from previous literature connecting plant parameters to plant and climate characteristics, highlight the utility of our simplified framework for understanding complex land‐atmosphere systems in terms of idealized scenarios in which ET responds to VPD only. This response is otherwise challenging to assess in an environment where many processes coevolve together. Plain Language Summary: Plants can sense increasing dryness in the air and close up the pores on their leaves, preventing water loss. However, drier air also naturally demands more water from the land surface. Here we develop a simplified theory for when land surface water loss increases (atmospheric demand dominates) or decreases (plant response dominates) in response to increased dryness in the air. This theory provides intuition for how ecosystems regulate water in response to changes in atmospheric dryness. According to the theory, ecosystems are capable of broad range of behavior in response to increased atmospheric dryness, from strongly reducing water loss to allowing large increases in water loss. Ecosystem behavior depends both on environmental conditions and plant type. Key Points: We derive a simplified analytical model for ecosystem‐scale evapotranspiration response to changes in vapor pressure deficit Ecosystems exhibit a range of behavior, from reductions to increases in evapotransipration, in response to increasing vapor pressure deficit The choice of stomatal conductance model fundamentally alters the relationship between evapotranspiration and vapor pressure deficit