Patient‐by‐patient basis anti‐tachycardia pacing for fast ventricular tachycardia with structural heart diseases. Issue 9 (18th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chinushi, Masaomi; Furushima, Hiroshi; Saitoh, Osamu; Noda, Takashi; Nitta, Takashi; Aizawa, Yoshifusa; Ohe, Tohru; Kurita, Takashi
• Is Part Of: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology. Volume 43:Issue 9(2020)
• Page Start: 983
• Page End: 991
• Publication Date: 2020-08-18
• Subjects: anti‐tachycardia pacing -- device treatment -- fast ventricular tachycardia; Cardiac pacing -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; 617.4120645
• DOI: 10.1111/pace.13980
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0147-8389

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Anti‐tachycardia pacing (ATP) delivered from an implantable device is an important tool to terminate ventricular tachycardia (VT). But its real‐world efficacy for fast VT has not been fully studied. Methods: Using the database of Nippon‐storm study, effect of patient‐by‐patient basis ATP programming for fast VT (≥188 bpm) was assessed for the patients with structural heart diseases. Fast VTs were divided into three groups depending on heart rate (HR); Group A was 188–209 bpm, and Group‐B and Group‐C were 210‐239 bpm and ≥240 bpm, respectively. Results: During a median follow‐up of 28 months, 202 fast VT episodes (209 ± 19 bpm) were demonstrated in the 85 patients. ATP terminated 151 of the 202 episodes (74.8%) in total. The success rate of the ATP was not different among the three groups: 73.3% in Group A, 80.6% in Group B, and 66.7% in Group C. ATP success rate of >50% and >70% was 77.6% and 64.7% of the patients, respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly higher in the patients with rather than without successful ATP therapy, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that LVEF of 23% was the optimal cut‐off value. ATP was less effective in patients taking amiodarone, but etiology of the structural heart diseases, indication of the device implantation, and all Electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters were not useful predictors for successful ATP therapy. Conclusions: ATP highly terminated fast VT with wide HR ranges in patients with structural heart diseases, and should be considered as the first‐line therapy for fast VT except for patients with very low LVEF.